Why SNES hardware is running faster than expected—and why it’s a problem

DSP Sample Test Program Sample Result.

Credit: Allen susal

DSP Sample Test Program Sample Result.


Credit: Allen susal

However, the effects of heat are full of natural clock variations in different consoles. Cecil samples show a difference in the slowest and fastest DSPS, about 0.7 % of the specification of 234 Hz, or 32,000 Hz.

The difference is so small that human players will probably not feel it directly. Tosboot team member total estimated that the quantity “can be at a maximum of one or two or two [of difference] Cecil said, “Skilled Speeders can see small differences, though, if the alignment of various CPUs and APUs,” cautions the enemy’s sample into something else “.

For spidron with the help of a frame perfect tool, although, the variations between the consoles can cause countless headache. As a Tasboot Team Member Nizzal Explained in your detailed analysis: “On a console it may take a 0.126 frame to process the music tech, it may take 0.127 frames on a different console. It may not look much but the start of the loading of the song is sufficient to delay the start of 1 frame (depending on the time, the interval and the game code).”



The Cecil’s survey found that different variations in consoles were much more than the effects of heat on any console.

The Cecil’s survey found that different variations in consoles were much more than the effects of heat on any console.


Credit:

SNES SMP Speed ​​Test Survey


Cecil also said that the survey reported DSP clock is slightly higher than expected, at an average of 32,078 Hz at room temperature. It is slightly higher than both the 32,000 Hz Spring and the 32,040 Hz rate set by Nintendo, which the emulator developers had determined in 2003 after taking the original hardware samples.

This is a proof of some observers, this is evidence that the actually produced in the 90s is getting a little faster than the age of the Snes Apus and can continue faster in the years and decades to come. But Cecil says the historical figures they have are definitely a lot of situations to make such a claim.

“We are all a group of different skilled goats and nerves, and what the results mean in our nature, which is okay, is to discuss it.” “The only thing we can say with certainty is the importance of the reaction statistics that shows that the current average DSP sample rate is 32,076 Hz, which is faster than the average original specification. The rest of its interpretation depends on the interpretation and what we can do is based on a certain amount of educated.”

Leave a Comment