White House Asks Supreme Court to ‘Rein In’ Judges Defying Trump

White House press secretary Karoline Lavit has said that the Supreme Court should “restrain” activist judges, which are thwarting President Donald Trump’s political agenda.

Why does it make a difference

The tension between the Trump administration and the federal judges to block its agenda is reaching its peak on the issue of exile before James Bosburg, which wants to influence Trump.

What to know?

Boseberg, a Federal Judge in Washington’s DC, is demanding whether the Trump administration has deported a group of Venezuela men in denial of a Bosburg court order.

In a White House press briefing on March 19, Levites called on the Supreme Court to act against Boseberg and other federal judges who have stopped Trump’s executive orders.

File Photo: On March 19, 2025, Caroline Levy is speaking during a daily briefing at the White House’s Brady briefing room in Washington DC.

Mandel Nagan/Getty Images

‘Discriminated Worker’

“The workers in the Supreme Court are responsible for imposing judges in the Supreme Court,” said Levit. These biased workers are damaging the judicial branch. “

He added that Trump has already made it clear that he wants to influence Bosberg.
“We have the mutual branches of the government for a reason, and the president feels very firmly about it,” said Levit.

He added that the President is very respectful of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, who issued a public statement on March 18, condemning the efforts to influence federal judges.

Massive deportation to continue

Levites told reporters: “Americans can expect to see the continuation of a mass deportation campaign.

“In this country, judges are acting mistakenly. We have judges who are working as discriminatory workers from the bench.

“They are trying to slowly slow down the agenda of this administration, and that is unacceptable,” said Levit.

Lawyers of the Justice Department have claimed to have filed a court in the court that the Allen Anims Act of 1798 allows Venezuela’s culprit to consider invading the United States as a foreign state, and then members of the group can be deported without judicial supervision.

What are people saying

Professor Anthony Alfiri, Director of the Center for Ethics and Public Service at the University of Miami School of LawTold Newsweek It is unlikely that the Supreme Court could support Trump’s alien enemy Act.

“The rights of non -alien enemies’ acts, history, or ideology, have not changed the rights of the rights of non -imposed notice, the full hearing, and the judicial review of the orders issued by the president or the deportation orders issued by the president.

“Based on the appropriate process and constitutional principles of equality protection through the Fifth Amendment, they protect non -Citizens against discrimination and discrimination by the President,” said Alfiri.

What happens next

The Supreme Court cannot accept Boseburg or any other federal judge.

To impress Boseburg, the House of Representatives will have to vote through the majority of the majority to hear the motion.

After that the Senate will have a hearing and it will have to vote for a two -thirds majority for its motion. Republicans do not have enough votes to happen.

The matter of deportation

In the case of deportation, Boseburg will hear the hearing on Thursday, March 20.

He has ordered that by this time, the Department of Justice gives full details of the deportation of Venezuela’s men in the weekend.

If this is not done, the Boseberg Trump can keep some officials of the Trump administration in contempt of court.

Leave a Comment