President Trump’s executive order has been effectively prevented transgender athletes from competing in girls and women’s sports and relies heavily on a new interpretation of women’s sports IX, in 1972 civil rights law Education programs prohibit sexual discrimination that federal funding.
This order directs the Education Department to investigate schools that do not comply and withdraw federal funds. It also urges the State Department to demand changes to the International Olympic Committee, which has abandoned the principles of eligibility to the global federations that rule over various sports.
This is what we know about this order, called “to keep men away from women’s sports.”
How does the title IX fit in these arguments?
The title IX bans sexual discrimination in youth and college level educational programs that receive federal funds. Since it falls under the executive branch, it is subject to different interpretations of different administrations that have used it to join and discuss the transgender students.
In 2023, the Biden administration proposed a change of a rule that would prevent schools from “clearly” transgender athletes belonging to teams that match their gender identification, and thus The rules of the title IX violate. The proposal will make the discretion of universities and K-12 schools that when there were questions around competitive justice, the discretion of transgender students to restrict the participation of students.
“The Bi, Biden administration, a Bi, Biden administration, tried to interpret sports discounts in a sex blind manner-we just your gender, just your gender,” said Duke University law professor Dorian Kolman. Will not see. ” And expert in gender and sports.
But the proposal was implemented only in some states through litigation, and the Biden administration withdrew the rules in December before the inauguration of Mr Trump, acknowledging that he would not go under the new president. ۔
In January, Republican -controlled House of Representatives passed a bill to stop transgender girls and women from sports programs for female students, and argued that it would strengthen the title IX. The Senate has not raised the issue.
Which rules related to transgender athletes already exist?
According to, twenty -five states remove the transgender students from participating in sports according to their gender identification Movement Planning PlanA think tank that focuses on gay, homosexual, abelange and transgender equality.
At the Collagite level, the NCAA follows the guidelines set by the national and global governing bodies, which have different standards in terms of sports. In an instance, volleyball Condition Consider that transgender athletes want to submit documents. This shows that they have taken the necessary steps to transfer their adoption gender.
How many transgender athletes are there in the United States?
The president of the NCAA, Charlie Baker, said in January, out of the 510,000 athletes, which are less than 10, which are publicly identified as transgender. The number of transgender athletes participating in youth and high school sports is not known.
According to the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law, who studies LGBTQ cases, transgender people in the United States are less than 1 % adults.
Transgender athletes responded to the order with frustration. An athlete and worker, Call Klimia, said the executive order is discriminatory, equivalent to the “end of the story”.
MX said, “Running has been a part of my life before I understand that I was a trans.” The word, which he and he uses both. “I am as runner as I Trans. It is a complete misunderstanding to try to deny any of these truths.
How does it fit on Trump’s agenda?
The order was widely expected. An organization that detects political advertisement and costs, according to data provided by the adamp, spent about 20 % of its overall advertising budget on transgender attack advertising.
a Town Hall in OctoberMr Trump replied, “When you solve the transgender problem in women’s sports”, “you will just ban it.”
It was the latest in a series of executive orders, at least aimed at transgender Americans.
Back to office on the first day, Mr Trump signed the orders, saying the government would defend women against “gender ideology extremism” by changing “efforts to eliminate the biological reality of sex”. Subsequently, federal employees have been ordered to remove any references about the conscience identifying them from their email signatures, and the centers of disease control and prevention centers cleaned thousands of pages of research Which includes terms like “Transgender,” “LGBT” and “pregnant person.”
Mr Trump has also signed these orders to prevent schools from recognizing transgender identities, ordered federal prisons to be the prisoners of transgender women in men’s facilities, demanding a ban on transgender soldiers and transgender. For the sake of eliminating gender certification medical care. Young.
Will there be a legal action?
Most likely, yes.
On Tuesday, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit for preventing the executive order banning gender certification for young people. On the same day, a judge temporarily stopped the prisons bureau from male prisoners from ordering transgender women from ordering executive orders.
The LGBTQ legal advocacy organization, the Lambda Legal, has implemented and controlled such sanctions at the state level.
In one case, the Supreme Court ruled that a transgender girl could continue to compete with her cross country and track team in West Virginia, while her appeal proceeded. Runner coaches and team colleagues supported their participation, and, in a brief thing, their lawyers wrote: “Despite regularly ending near the back of the pack, she likes to play, her friends He likes to entertain and try his best. “
Jenny Pazer, chief legal officer of the Lambda Legal, said that in another, the court agreed that the law could not deny the ability to join the Tennessee’s transgender boy in his golf team.
“In both of these cases, the court looked at the limits of the student and the game and the related evidence to consider who was discriminated against,” said Ms Paiser.
At a December hearing, the NCAA indicated that it was expected to be explained at the federal level.
“We are a national governing body and we follow federal law,” said Mr Baker, President of the NCAA.
