Donald Trump campaigned for countries like Ukraine to reduce government waste and foreign aid. Once he took office, he independently identified the billionaire businessman Elon Musk as the head of a new task force called the government’s performance (Dodge).
Trump, Kasturi and his allies have used USEAD as a symbol of wasteful government spending, in which Kasturi describes it as “devil” and “criminal organization” on X.
A portion of Americans may be open to deductions: Six out of 10 US adults believed that the US government spent a lot of foreign aid, according to a survey of the Associate Press and Nurk in March 2023.
The United States is the world’s largest humanitarian aid, but it still represents only one part of the total federal spending.
On a visit to Central America this week, Foreign Secretary Marco Rubio – who is now the acting head of USAID – emphasized patience and defended the changes to the staff meeting in Guatemala.
According to the New York Times, “I know it is difficult to ask for patience,” he told the Yos Aid Head of Mission Haven Cruz Hubrd. “I know it’s hard to ask for trust, because you have never met me before.”
But his tough comments about USAID came to Fox News, when he accused the agency of “ranking classification”.
USAID staff told the BBC that comments did not create confidence. “We work 24 hours to answer all the DC’s works, questions, so I don’t really know what that means,” said an employee of USAID in Central America.
The White House and the State Department have highlighted foreign aid, which they believe is not in accordance with the administration’s goals.
“I think the most important thing is that the United States will have to get its financial home to work anywhere in the future, and we do so,” Mike Turner, a member of the Republican Congress, told the BBC. Are in the process. ” Thursday
Republican Senator Jim Resich, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he supported Trump, saying that “the idea of ​​merging the USAID and the State Department has been presented by almost every administration since 1998”.
USAID programming can sometimes be “extremely inaccessible”, acknowledging a recently -kept employee, relying on USAID’s financing. When she stopped the funding, she and other colleagues were allowed to leave.
Given the uncertainty of the job, demanding anonymous, he said the programs could be useless, and that it had seen non -governmental organizations making mistakes through paperwork or operations abroad. He said, but the performance is not behind USAID’s death.
“There is a disturbance in creating a lot of chaos,” said a non -profit worker. “What do we have to remove? I think it is eliminating the federal government and gathering power.”
