US urged to ‘think bigger’ on healthcare amid Trump onslaught on sector | US healthcare

An educational journal may injure some hopefulness in the US health policy – a small commodity between the Trump administration’s widespread relief, freezing and ideological research studies.

A new issue of health issues argues that conversation about health care may change – and altogether – if experts invest in “big” and policy makers in their communities.

“We saw what happened in public screaming at the murder of United Healthcare CEO,” said Dr. Victor Rai, a family physician and director of a health and political economy project at New York City.

“There is a feeling here that people are fed up and people are looking for a big alternative. People have really viive visual feelings about these issues and if people bring ideas with ideas on the scale of these challenges, there is a way to deal with them.”

Health policy has rapidly become a major touchstone of mega (“re -make America great”), as the Trump administration has launched a shock and amazing campaign that has dramatically changed public health institutions.

In just a few weeks, the administration has cleared public health health websites about women and ethnic minorities, reviewing billions of scientific grants requests to be in accordance with the president’s agenda, and confirmed that the country’s most important vaccine is a high -ranking health career, Robert F.K. The administration has also said it will oust the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO), which is Helped In 1948.

In addition, Congress Republicans have demonstrated major deductions for Medicide, which is a health insurance program for low -income and disabled people, which insures about 72 72 million Americans, to expand tax deductions, which benefits the wealthy.

But beyond the recent turmoil, the scale of the Challenges challenges of American Health Care is to see something: America spends More As part of the overall domestic product, about health care compared to almost any other country, yet there are some worst consequences in developed democracies. It’s a Globally For universal health care and failure to offer one of the few countries that allow its citizens to go bankrupt with medical debt.

How to fix it? Rye says do not apply tinkers around the edges. Instead, look upwards to the solution of health problems. Remove the statement about “deserving Ness”. Review what is working in cities and states.

In an interview, Roy cited this example Philadelphia Joey Bank – A small program that provides $ 1,000 basic income to pregnant and postpartum women. This money is not asked any question, which is a world of differences with traditional “welfare”, or temporary help for families (TANF).

TANF once provided temporary cash assistance to the poor. Since the welfare reform of Clinton, the program has been expelled from resources. Very few payments have lost the venue with inflation and work needs and many people have suffered from unbearable bureaucratic obstacles.

In Connecticut, legislators first established in the country “Baby Bonds“A small investment account for every low -income child generated in the state. This program provides each child $ 3,200 to every child that is planted in the market, and can be used to buy a house, start a business, or pay for higher education or retirement.

In Washington DC, Reformers US Economic Freedoms Plan The recent anti -trust conquest is using the lessons to emphasize the proposed “glass stagal for health care.” The initiative, called Break the big medicine.This refers to the Glass Stegel Legislature of the New Dell era, which separated investment banks from commercial banks.

In this case other articles suggest Home Care CooperativeTo provide home care workers to provide better working conditions as the age of babe boomers; Re -invest in public hospitals and public output of pharmaceuticals, such as California m 100m investment In local, public insulin production; Or to provide Social insurance People can’t work for times.

In a statement about the matter, Catherine, the chief editor of Health Affairs, Catherine, said, “The current approach to the health policy is surpassing the people of the United States, including rural and low -income people and historically backward classes.”

“Policy makers need to know that there is another way. A approach that prefers investing in patients, communities and health care physicians and workers.”