Law has long been one of President Trump’s favorite weapons against media outlets, which he objected to coverage. But in at least one case, he is facing an unexpected obstacle: his previous arguments in court.
On Monday, the board, which gives a Pltzer prizes – which Mr Trump filed in 2022 filed a case of defamation in Florida – said the matter should be stopped because, as Mr Trump said in two other cases. What is the argument, a state court should not be so. A sitting president should be allowed to control.
The law firm representing the board, “The defendants agree,”, representing the Blard Speaker. “To avoid such constitutional disputes, the court should stay on the matter until the term of the plaintiff is over.”
In Mr Trump’s case, the Pulitzer Board has been accused of being reproached. Last year, a state judge in Florida cleared the case to proceed to the trial.
Of the plotzer board Filing On Monday, the president’s legal team bowed a lot to the statements made in other matters. The “The Apprentice” Reality Show was a case filed in 2017 by Samar Zaros, who accused the president of unwanted sexual progress. Mr Trump’s team argued that his suit should be thrown out or delayed because to deal with it – including forced to prepare a record during discovery or to appear in court – Mr. Trump’s own job The ability to do is “disrupt and disrupt”. (The case was settled in 2021, after being out of office.)
Mr Trump’s lawyers repeated this argument in a different way last week Case In Delaware, in which he and his social media company are defendants.
In the Pulitzer case, Mr. Trump’s lawyer R. Quinsbird did not respond to the request to comment.
Filing of the Plutzer Board on Monday was the second time since the November elections, when Mr Trump’s opponents have tried to change their arguments in other cases against them in defamation cases.
Last time last month, it included a different set of legal issues compared to those who played in the Pulitzer suit.
Mr Trump was being tried for defamation by those named Central Park Five, who was wrongly convicted and forgiven in the rape and attack of a Jogger in 1989, But Mr Trump described it as killers during the presidential debate last September. .
Mr Trump tried to reject the litigation, in the debate that his comments in the debate are widespread.
Last month, the lead lawyer of five persons Shannon Spectr, Debate This was the case to decide the jury.
To support this argument, Mr Spectators pointed to Mr Trump’s argument in which he brought against ABC News and Anchor George Stefanoplos. When the ABC noted that Mr Stephanoplos was widely accurate, saying that Mr Trump was held responsible for rape – in fact, he was found responsible for sexual abuse – Mr Trump’s lawyer Successfully argued that it should be left on the jury.
The matter was moving towards the case when the ABC agreed to pay 15 million millions for legal action last month.
