tHe said these comments were arrogant, sharp, jaw, brave and only provocative to many people. On Wednesday morning, the French paper labor replied. The New York border Times satisfied itself with “impossible”. An American senator voiced that in the coming hours and days and even more in the Middle East and beyond, a fabric will be charged, what Donald Trump said about Gaza. “Ethnicity by another name”.
On Tuesday, at the end of the White House meeting with Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, President Trump announced that the United States should control the Gaza Strip and that its 2.2 million Palestinians permanently Egypt and Jordan In places, should be removed for resettlement. Trump said the United States was “owned and responsible.” “We will handle it and develop it,” he added. There will be an unlimited number of jobs and housing for “people in the area” – though who they will be not explained. Gaza will be transformed into a “Middle East’s Raera”.
Since Hamas’s horrific attack on Israel in October 2023, it has probably suffered another catastrophe for at least one region, which mobilized 16 months of Israeli attacks on Gaza. Surprisingly, one of the key players in search of any solution was immediately confronted. Within hours, Saudi Arabia rejects the Palestinian migration plan and re -considered that it will not establish diplomatic relations with Israel – so far one of Trump’s major Middle Eastern policy goals – Palestinian Without the establishment of the state.
It is difficult to count where it currently leaves a critical Seas fire process between Hamas and Israel. The second phase of the ceasefire agreement begins next week, including the United States, Israel, Hamas, Egypt and Qatar. Their goal is to agree to further hostage and exchange of prisoners, to extend the current period of limited wars indefinitely and to agree on who will rule Gaza.
Trump’s statements throw this last part of Phase two in the air. They also disrupt the rest of the process. But the stake is very high. If there is no agreement, Israel can resume the war within weeks. This is the result that Netanyahu, who is going to benefit Trump’s free wheeling, will probably be in favor of it, as it will keep his government together. Israel’s most entitled parties, some of whom consider Gaza a part of Israel anyway, will also see Trump’s remarks as an important turning point in his favor, along with the Western Bank implications. Palestinians will do the will See it as a fraud.
Trump’s remarks have caught the United States and the world at the hop. But they did not come out completely from the blue. Before returning to the White House, Trump had occasionally made similar comments. They immediately of their opening in January. Later, Gaza was a “place to demolish massively”. “This is an extraordinary place in the sea – the best weather. You know, everything is good. That’s it, some beautiful things can be done with it.
It seemed like US President Trump’s voice instead of US President Trump. The same was true of his comments on Tuesday. Yet Trump always blurred personal and political. It would be a mistake to think that he is not serious at any level. Just last week, Trump sent his Middle East envoy, Steve Watkov himself a billionaire real estate developer, to make the first visit to Gaza by an American official since the beginning of the war.
No one should diminish the importance of bluffs and disturbances in the trauma of Trump’s current snowstorms on several topics besides the Middle East and remote announcements. Nevertheless, for a president who came to power in 2017, and who has now done so again after eight years, and promised to keep the United States first on both occasions, Tuesday’s remarks are a wonderful face. There are a limit result, if they were ever, they would have been. Become a serious policy.
Since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, the US foreign policy has felt hesitating, especially in the Middle East, engaging, engaging and occupying. At that time, the US military has occasionally played a key role in conflicts in Libya to Syria, as well as in Afghanistan, often under the radar or merely from the sky. But Trump’s predetermined international stance has always been bringing our troops out of the fire line, while demanding that others – like Europe in Ukraine – move their own promises.
On Tuesday, though, Trump appeared to be open to the idea that US troops would be deployed to implement the idea of Gaza’s occupation. Exterior. , US troops can also take charge of efforts to force Palestinians. It denys the belief that such an operation, defamatory from international law, and essentially included tens of thousands of military personnel, we will not include forces, killing, and if, if If Iraq is a leader, human rights violations are accused of violating human rights violations. Locals. In other words, the same kind of overseas engagement, which Trump has always said that he opposes.
Yet Trump’s second term is already different. Very surprising, and Gaza gave remarks with the latest example, it has begun to speak with the language of imperialism. It has threatened to occupy Greenland, re -claim to the Panama Canal, connect Canada, rename the Gulf of Mexico and now occupy Gaza, now, threatening to rename Mexico’s name Have done He may decide to move Palestinians to New Foundland next week.
The critical question is, does any of it mean seriously? “This was not made lightly,” Trump said on Tuesday. Nevertheless, it is in detail as a original policy and so naturally, that perhaps even the president himself cannot say that even a US soldier will ever serve in Gaza or someone The US dollar will also be invested in the level of development there.
In addition, seriousness may be in different forms, as Trump’s second presidency is appearing. Trump probably doesn’t really want to occupy Gaza. But the fact is that it has said that it is a fact that in the Middle East and domestic American politics, renovate other facts.
In less than three weeks, when he took oath again, Trump has proved to be far more wonderful politicians in the chaos of his first term. The performance of their presidential orders may be really changing the US, or it can easily remove the public to think that they are changing it. The difference can be less difference in our view.
In a political culture that dominates social media rather than legislation and legal process, giving the impression, even in the impossible case like Gaza, is more powerful and promptly than such cautious policy -making. Whose government likes the Career star. . Trump cannot provide more materially for millions of people who voted for them, but what they are doing to convince them shines a disturbing light in future politics.
Do you have any opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response to 300 words by email to consider the post in our letter section, please click here.
