Cnn
B (b (b (
For Donald Trump, revenge is a dish that is hot piping.
The president is not wasting time to follow the trail view of his repeated campaign to change.
Trump sends a cool message by the US government: officials who cross it, investigate alleged power, or once they join their critics after leaving office. Their livelihood and even their lives can be at risk. But those who work in its name, even violently, like January 6, 2021, can expect protection, like criminals.
The calculation collected speeds on Monday.
- More than a dozen career officials, who worked on Trump’s investigation into the Justice Department and who should have civil service reservations, were told that their agenda was not trusted to “loyal”. What can be done
- In another development, the administration opened a “special project” to take concrete steps to monitor the criminal barrier cases against some January 6 defendants.
- Following these measures, after the dismissal of more than a dozen government agency Watch Dog officials known as Inspectors General. It was lost to anyone that the official who told Congress about Trump’s pressure on Ukraine, which was to investigate Biden, which led to Trump’s first position, was the intelligence community IG.
- Last week, Trump snatched security details from some former key officials, including former Foreign Secretary Mike Pompeo and former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who threatened by Iran after Trump’s service during his first term. Finding
- Trump’s legal tactics came with a growing move to snatch the top layers of civil service. In another surprising move, the administration immediately left about 60 senior senior officials after Trump’s executive order, in which almost all foreign aid has been frozen.
- Since the president targeted government officials who did not break the law, Washington is still suffering from Pardes and his trip to thousands of riots on January 6, some of whom defeated police officers in 2021.
These measures show that Trump is determined to learn a lesson from his first term, when he was often disappointed with government checks and balances, and he believes that career officials have failed.
Over the next four years, the question that will be a repeated question will be whether the extraordinary actions by Trump are disrupting the anti -establishment that usually disrupt the presidential decoration or they are illegal or corrupt.
Conservatives argue that Trump is in accordance with his rights to stop the government, after winning the election and saying exactly the same. Prior to Trump, many Republicans found that the Federal Bureaucracy had actively thwarted right -wing policies, which voters had installed to keep the president to him. And one of the reasons Trump won last November was his case that the federal government was thwarting the American people in many ways.
Many Republican Presidents also agree with the claims that several criminal investigations against him in the last four years have been politically oppressed. Once it is accepted, the line between careers and political appointments in the DOJ is fading for many conservatives who believe that the entire legal system is bad and biased.
Nevertheless, Trump’s recent efforts to thwart accountability are unusual. In any general administration-which does not feature the constant drama drama drama strategy of flooding zone-none of them will have a scandal. For example, in 1993, the First Lady Hillary Clinton firing at the White House Travel Office was given a rise to an ethical investigation by the DOJ and the FBI, which ends only in the last year of the Clinton administration. Didn’t happen
Presidents can win the mandate, but this does not give them the right to break the law. The Trump administration failed to give the Congress a 30 -day notice of the dismissal of the Inspectors General, which also raised concerns among the GOP senators. And when presidents often dismiss politically appointed prosecutors for taking power, career DOJ officials are sheltered through legal protection.
Former Republican Congress member Ken Book told CNN Erin Burnett on Monday that the issue of the sacred career department’s employees was “unique”, which was influenced by political goals and was “wrong”.
Acting officials, who are not accused of criminal wrongdoing, were informed by Acting Attorney General James Mc Henry. He wrote: “Given your important role in legal action against the president, I am not sure that the leadership of the department can trust you to help enforce the president’s agenda loyalty.” The administration is not hiding from the fact that it is a revenge because it refers to Trump’s litigation in the investigation of former special lawyer Jack Smith’s election interference and storage of documents.
Jennifer Rogers, a CNN analyst, highlighted the distinctions among the professionals of the Justice Department in the offices, which accuse political goals and prosecutions who accuse criminal cases.
“The president should not have a criminal cases agenda. … In a criminal circle, you do not need priorities, you have to follow the facts, and the law needs to be applied, and the charge needs to be charged. “
Trump’s first term – when he, for example, dismissed FBI Chief James Kami on Russia’s investigation and turned Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recover himself – he took recent steps. Indicated motivations. It seems that he is trying to scare career officials who can investigate it or prevent its extensive use of executive power. He is also sending a signal to his new administration for assistants. If they activate it, they can end like Pompeo or Bolton.
In the meantime, the ousting of the Inspectors General can ensure that waste, fraud and political abuses investigating watchdogs can be investigated.
Former Home Department Inspector General Mark Green Bluet was fired by Trump, saying the biggest concern was the end of independent surveillance.
“The entire construction of the Inspectors General, it is based on our liberation, that we are not seeing any political party of any belt, that we as a taxpayers’ representatives there to fight balls and strike without a dog in the fighting. There are calls to make, “Green Bluett told CNN’s Casey Hunt on Monday.
“What will President Trump do with these positions? Is he going to nominate the watchdog or is he going to nominate lipids? … If he takes the path to nominate and appoint political locks, then I think that US taxpayers, Congress, stakeholders across the country should be involved in weapons.
Constitutional treatment courts and Congress for those angry with Trump’s actions. But neither depends on the task.
It is unclear whether the administration really cares that most of the legal sanctions care about it, and the president has always worn for long -term appeals to support any legal dispute. Use the strategies. There is no guarantee that a Supreme Court, which granted Trump a good exception to government operations last year, will rule against him in a unique case investigating the scope of presidential powers.
The Republican, who controls both the chambers of the Congress, has shown very little hunger to check Trump’s power, which has refused to sentence him in two cases. And senators who have begun the election of their controversial cabinet have faced the threats of basic challenges.
On Sunday, while commenting on the IGS issue on CNN’s “State of the Union”, Sen Lindsay Graham gave rise to the exiting sentiment about Trump’s power. South Carolina Republican said Trump should have given 30 days notice to Congress before terminating officials to comply with the law.
But he added: “The question is, is it okay for him to take people in a place where he thinks he can perform his agenda? Yes. He won the election. What do you expect, leave everyone in Washington before being selected? “This makes me truly realized. Get new people. It feels like the government has not done a great job for the American people.
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grasley has long been supportive of the IGS. And he released a statement on Saturday asking for more details. But it would be surprising that if the veteran Iowa Republican Trump comes to the administration.
Another Trump ally, San Tom. Cotton said on Sunday that inspectors serve on the general president’s happiness and “they want new people there.” But the Arkansas Republican expressed instability with the president for treating Pompeo and Bolton and asked to re -consider other and again targeted by Iran. “It is better to be safe than regret, because it is not just about men who helped President Trump perform his policy in his first term,” said Cotton on Fox News Sunday. “
“This is about their family and friends, whenever they are public, about innocent passers -by. It is also about the president to get good people and get good advice.
Trump was asked last week if he would feel responsible if something happened to former infectious diseases official Bolton or Dr. Anthony Fuki, who because of his role in responding to Kovide 19 pandemic diseases Politically encouraged security threats face.
“No,” he replied.
A president who survived two attempts to murder and had been surrounded by secret service officers throughout his lifetime, adding: “I think, you know, when you work for the government, a chance But the details of your security end. ”
