Donald Trump has restored its proposal to handle Gaza among widespread opposition – even with his own supporters – saying that the region ended by Israel after the end of its military attack against Hamas. Will “destroy”.
Trump reinforced his commitment to this idea Remebling post On Thursday, on his true social network, even when it was revealed that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to a White House was announced without any warning, which purely his He was his own and was not subjected to detailed conversation with him.
He wrote, “At the end of the Gaza Strip war, Israel will be extradited to the United States.”
“Palestinians… With new and modern homes in the region, they will be resettled in more secure and more beautiful communities than ever. They will really have the opportunity to be happy, safe and free. Will!
The post -Trump reaction to his widespread condemnation of his original announcement on Tuesday was when he said the coastal region could be turned into a “Middle East’s Rowera” when 2.3 million Palestinians living there live in other countries It was for you.
The advice gave rise to waves of trauma in the Middle East, and the UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, warned against “any form of ethnicity”. He also fought resistance between the president’s “re -making America great” (mega) base and Republican senators, some of whom said in a twisted manner that he would not go with it.
Trump’s latest statement came when the White House appeared to be backing up with the idea of ​​criticism. It has been revealed that Trump had discussed it with some springs before publicly announces it, while no feasibility studs were taken by the Department of State or the Pentagon, as foreign policy Major steps are customary.
No working groups were formed to check the details. Nor did the study estimate how many US troops may need to be deployed to spread the most extraordinary ordinance in large numbers.
Defense officials, who may be demanded to occupy and secure the area, as they have been rebuilt, said that when Trump announced it, he first about the idea. Listen to The Pentagon has received no formal request to prepare a plan for the deployment of troops, The Wall Street Journal reported.
It seems that there has been no consideration for the Palestinian population to move elsewhere. The White House press secretary, Crown Levit, issued a statement on Wednesday that the allegation was equivalent to verifying “ethnic cleansing” and could create a war crime. Gaza residents, many of whom are descendants of homeless refugees.
Trump allegedly seized the idea after a recent visit to Gaza, through a Middle East envoy and a billionaire property developer, who told him that after Israel’s military bombing caused widespread destruction. “Uninhabited”.
The proposal contradicts his public opposition to US intervention in the Middle East, for which he has criticized the past administration.
Although Republicans have publicly praised Trump’s expansionist foreign policy wishes since taking office – which includes suggestions for buying Greenland and occupying the Panama Canal – much less enthusiasm for being involved in Gaza There is anger.
“We love the president, but our focus in the war room is Eastern Palestine, not Palestine,” his former aide and his most vocal chair leader called the podcast of his war room on Wednesday Ohio Referring to a town, he told the podcast of his combat room that after the 2023 accident, severe pollution was caused, which included a train carrying hazardous waste.
South Carolina’s Republican Senator and another Trump ally Lindsay Graham said all his Senate colleagues opposed sending us troops to send us to Gaza.
“All I can say is that I want to destroy Hamas, but I have been on the phone with the Arabs all day. Is a non -starter for.
Hill Another Republican Senator cited – who requested not to disclose his name to discuss the mood of his colleagues – saying: “The concern is who is responsible for the reconstruction of Gaza? The reaction of most Americans, which I have been included, is ‘not ours’.
Former US ambassador to Israel under Barack Obama, Daniel Shapiro, said the idea was dangerous even if it was unlikely to result.
“The danger is that the extremists and terrorists of different striides within the Israeli government will take it literally and seriously, and begin to practice it.” Told the New York Times. “This can affect further release of hostages, reducing a goal at the back of US personnel and the chances of normalizing Saudi Israel.”
