President Trump and author E Jane Carol are arguing about whether a Supreme Court decision that they hold a large criminal immunity, insulting them and saying that he lies about sexual abuse. Tens of millions of losses have been saved to speak.
Mr Trump made his arguments last year in appeal for a jury’s $ 83.3 million decision, in which he was found responsible for defaming Ms Carol in 2019 when he accused of decades -old attacks. On Monday, Ms Carol pushed back quickly.
His lawyer, Roberta A. Kapilin, briefly argued that Mr Trump’s view of the Supreme Court’s decision, which saved him from allegations that he tried to end the 2020 elections, was very broad. Is He wrote that his statements were strictly personal, calling Ms Carol’s accusation “a complete job” and “a fraud and a lie”. He said he had fallen out of the boundaries of government operations that protected the presidential immunity.
In her brief statement, Ms Kapille said, “If there was ever an issue where the immunity does not save the president’s speech, that is it.”
The dispute over the Supreme Court’s historic decision, which resolved the president’s prosecution’s scope of immunity, came to light when Mr Trump ended criminal cases against him in two states, and third. The delay is delayed. In the fourth case, in New York, Mr Trump was convicted of a 34 -count in a trial, from paying a porn star to paying money, the judge did not impose any time for the jail.
But Ms Carol’s legal battle with Mr Trump – fought in two cases for more than half a decade and is now based in the Federal Appeal Court for another circuit in Manhattan – moving forward.
Mr Trump’s lawyer, De John Souver, cited the Supreme Court’s decision last summer, saying, “The presidential immunity has predicted any responsibility here and all claims need to be fully dismissed. ” (Mr Trump has then chose Mr Sower to serve as the US Solicitor General in his administration.)
Last month, the second circuit appeal court upheld the Million 5 million decision in the second case against Mr Trump, which was filed by Ms. Carol against her in Manhattan.
In this case, in May 2023, a federal jury found Mr Trump responsible for sexually abusing Ms. Carol in the Bergdorf Gadman dressing room in the mid -1990s. It also revealed that when he had discredited him, in 2022, he said of the truth social that his case was a fraud and a lie.
Ms Carol testified at the 2023 trial that she entered Mr Trump at the Fifth Avenue Department Store, and sought help to buy a gift for a female friend. He said he ended in the department of Linjri, where Mr Trump forced him to go to the dressing room and hit him off the wall. He then pulled his tights down and inserted his finger and then inserted his penis into his vagina, he testified.
Ms Carol accused Mr Trump of rape. The jury of six men and three women found that Mr. Trump had been sexually abused, but he did not find that he had abused him. Jorus has never said why he chose a lesser crime of sexual abuse on rape, which was then described as a sexual intercourse without any consent under the law of New York, in which the opening of the vagina I include entering the penis.
Lewis A. Kapilin, a trial judge of the US District Court, ruled that when he did not raise it in the legal action, Mr Trump pardoned any of the immunity arguments.
Against Mr Trump. The decision of the 83.3 million jury was decided in the second trial of Ms Carol, in January 2024. In this case, Mr Trump created comments in 2019, while he was in office during his first term after Ms Carol. In a quote from a New York magazine book, he accused him of abusing him in the dressing room.
Mr Trump lied to his accusation and said that he had never met Ms Carol and did not know who he was. He attacked him in social media posts and news conferences.
Ms Carol kept the attack a secret for years, before she told only two close friends before she revealed it in a magazine quote.
