In the first weeks of President Trump, for all of the trauma and fear, most of them should be very surprised. Many of his actions are extended to his first term agenda, when he promised to crack about immigration and strengthen the country’s benefits in international trade.
But in some important ways, Mr. Trump’s return to power has been identified by some deep ideological swings when he moves to re -build Washington, the United States and the world. On both domestic fronts and foreign affairs, Mr Trump has been on a different, even more aggressive, even more aggressive, towards the role of the government and the role of the United States globally.
The 45th president was never much shrinking the government’s conservatory. In fact, he was just as free spending like Democrats and, thanks to the large part of the Coid -19 Relief, left behind, left behind The greatest reconciliation government in history. But now the 47th president has released Elon Musk to present the federal government through his “wooden chapar”, as the billion Patti said, an agency after an agency. “Balanced budget !!!” Mr. Trump Written on social media The last week
Similarly, President Trump condemned the overseas country and tried to oust the United States from the Middle East to focus the country’s resources in its borders. The second President Trump seems determined to swallow the foreign territory and expand these borders, in which a Middle East enclave is also in dire need of the country, because America’s first isolation is a form of America’s first imperialism. Gives the way.
“In these special ways, Trump 1.0 and Trump 2.0 look very different,” said Julian E. Zelizer, a editing book on Mr Trump’s first term. “If we look at the first term, there is room for some of it – he was against the government but he did not work much about it. This is a lot of things.
In fact, Mr. Trump was never particularly connected to a theory. He changed the political parties five times before the Republican status in 2016, and on one occasion or at another occasion for abortion rights, controlling guns, more taxes on the rich and invading Iraq They were against all.
The most consistency through the line of returning to his days as a real estate developer in the 1980s has been convinced that the United States is being cheated on with friends and enemies, which has made trade, security and unity I have informed their views about. Otherwise, if it is in accordance with his interests, he is willing to move the direction.
“Trump has not changed clearly,” said Jeremy Shapiro, a former State Department official in the Obama administration, who is now in the European Council on Foreign Relations. “What has changed is the administration of it – the people around it. The guards are gone and the adults have gone out of the room. Now we are seeing a very pure version of Trump, which traditional advisers and American Less filters have been filtered by governance agencies.
Absent from these limits, Mr. Trump appears to be attracted to the theory driven by pure elasticity of power.
Last week put it on a clear display. Even when Mr Musk’s team effectively abolished the US agency for international development and targeted other agencies, Mr Trump claims US ownership over Gaza and the entire population of 2 million Palestinians. Was preparing a passionate plan to get home.
The Gaza plan has come up in recent weeks after Mr Trump has repeatedly purchased Greenland, occupying the Panama Canal, and expressing his desire to make Canada a “51st state”, which did not broadcast on the campaign.
Although he used the idea of buying a greenland in his first term, he dropped it when Denmark (who monitors the sovereign area) rejected it and any of his public speeches during the 2024 campaign Or never mentioned it in the interview, FactsA service that composes and analyzes Mr. Trump’s presidency data. He never suggested during the campaign that Canada had become part of the United States, nor did he mention USAID according to the search, nor once mentioned.
When Mr Trump has moved the Panama Canal to Panama on the US transfer for many years, he never suggested withdrawing it during his latest campaign.
When he enjoyed such provocative ideas during his first term, the Establishment Republican and four-star generals were retired in his orbit-often tried to end it successfully. Mr Trump has made it clear that he is sorry to consider his advice. Now, those advisers have gone, instead of Mr. Musk and the right crusade staff who are making him happy.
In fact, some of the most controversial tactics of the past few weeks had ideas that Mr Trump was last played with, but was eventually agreed to leave. For example, during his first term, he considered his attempt to eliminate the guarantee of the Citizenship of the 14th Amendment, but in fact never did against the Republican opposition.
However, this time, Mr Trump removed the warning that he had no constitutional authority to do so and Signed an order Except for the citizenship of birth in the early hours of his new period, even though it has been blocked by the courts so far.
It has also lost in other ways that have made more transactions. He called for a ban on tickets during his first term, saying his Chinese ownership pose a threat to national security. But after discovering the benefits of reaching young voters through the app during his campaign last fall, Mr Trump turned. He is currently violating a law that needs to be closed.
Similarly, he regularly attacked technology tycoes in his first term and called for legislation to limit the strength of Facebook, Google, Twitter and others. But after Mr Musk bought Twitter in X and reclaimed Invested 8 288 million in Mr Trump’s electionThe President has embraced the Big Tech.
Presidential historian at the University of Texas in Austin, Jeremy Suri, said that over time, the presidents close the suggestions they do not want to hear in favor of their advice. “It really fits a historic model,” said Mr Suri. “Over time, the presidents rely on a close and more limited circle. They are isolated and often exceeded.
Mr Musk, in particular, has shown the willingness to blow up the present government in a way that Mr. Trump’s past advisers have never done. This has led to a desire to seek revenge against Mr Trump’s government, which he claims to have tried to thwart it during his first term and to prosecute him in the last four years.
Mark Short said, “When he was Mr Trump’s first vice president, Mark Short, who served as the Chief of Staff in Mike Pence, said,” It is about getting a deep state instead of setting up a financial home. More “” I still think that conservatives should celebrate these deductions. But I am not yet ready to claim that this is a sincere effort to reduce the size and scope of the government.
In fact, Mr Trump’s advisers have developed the idea of returning the government as part of the Culture War. Russell TVOT, who has just been confirmed as Mr. Trump’s budget director, developed a budget plan in 2023, titled “The pledge to abolish the awakening and weapons government.”
In addition to the culture war, Michael R Sterin, director of the economic policy at the American Enterprise Institute, said another factor behind the new enthusiasm for Mr Trump’s budget axis desire to renew his first -term tax deductions. It was and add more. Mr Stearin said, “They need to reduce costs, to increase and increase tax deductions for 2017, or they will blow up the deficit.”
During his first term, Mr Trump approved the government to scale, but put a little muscle in it. He proposed to cut medical capping and food stamps, federal pensions, form subsidies, energy subsidies and other programs under his official budget plan. But the Congress immediately ignored the project and Mr Trump let him go.
An important test of changing views about Mr Trump’s government will come when he proposes his first budget, which will be prepared by the Office of Management and Budget, and if the President is tired of a Congress. The Republican will put pressure to adopt it with the majority.
“Of course, the presidential budget is generally neglected by Congress, but this year may be different,” said Chris Edwards, director of tax policy studies at the Liberian Cato Institute. “Trump has a lot of popularity within his party, so if he decides to accept the deductions in the future OMB spending, he should be able to move forward in the Congress.”
But no matter how painful or reddish it may be, the attacks on Mr. Musk’s federal agencies will do very little to reach a balanced budget as long as Mr Trump has social media on social media. Security, medical deductions rejected. And the army. About 71 % of federal spending Goes to these areas, other health care costs and interest on loan.
Jessica Riddle, a senior fellow of the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank, said Mr Musk’s attention could focus on high -profile items such as diversity, equity and joining programs or news media organizations on high profile items such as subscriptions, but his “mega The base can be incited “but the amount is” Magay Base “but” the budget is mainly in the scheme of things. “
“Trump is still spending a huge spending,” he said. “Defending $ 1 billion from the DEI government contracts and membership of the Politico will not increase defense and border costs by $ 325 billion, as Congress is preparing to do.”
