Washington (APP) – President Donald Trump The Supreme Court will be required, which he appointed three judges Many actions He has taken his second White House in just a few weeks.
But even a conservative majority may be moving towards some of the presidential activities with a strong view of presidential power.
The court last year gave Trump a major victory, which, postponed to hearing his criminal trial in Washington DC, helped remove potential obstacles in his election, and then resorted to it. Exception from prosecution For government measures. But Trump’s first term won some of the crucial defeats in court.
“This would be an extraordinary test for the Roberts Court to see if he was ready for constitutional principles that he had long accepted,” said Michael Waldman, president of the Brennan Center at the University of New York University. . “Some of the things we have seen are so clear that I am sure that the court will stand. Other things that are associated with the accumulation of the power of the presidency are very nervous to me.
There is no shortage of cases that can find a way for the country’s highest court. The lower courts already exist Holding orders On the citizenship of birthright, a freelancer on government grants and loans, and a purchase order for federal workers.
Other legislatures have been banned, restrictions on transgender people, boundaries of asylum seekers, Attempts to shutter USAIDElon Musk and his team’s access to sensitive data and firing of officials in independent federal agencies.
Trump met with a mixed success in court in his first term. With 5-4 votes, the judges maintained its ban on the US travel to most Muslim countries, but the courts only blocked its first version.
These five conservative judges supported the firing of the head of Trump’s user Finance Protection Bureau and cleared the way to tap billions of dollars of Pentagon funds to build border wall with Mexico for administration, while on that amount The case continued.
At the same time, Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court with the then Justice Liberal Block to prevent Trump from the end of the DACA program for immigrants that were brought here as a child. The same five -thirds majority also prevented the administration from adding questions about citizenship in the 2020 census.
Roberts too Of the blasphemy Trump condemned a judge who rejected his immigrant asylum policy as a “Obama Judge”.
One of the biggest differences from Trump’s first presidency is that only three liberal judges after Roth Bed Gansberg Death In the last months of his tenure in September 2020, Trump allowed Amy Konny Barrett to be appointed as the third justice, Amy Connie Barrett. She had previously joined Trump’s appointments, Neil Gorsuich and Brett Kavanov.
Birthright’s citizenship may present an important initial test
This time the problem may be in the first Birthright Citizenship For parents’ children who are illegally in the United States. The administration has already indicated that it will appeal the decision of a judge who has blocked it so far.
Depending on how quickly the Federal Appeal Court works in San Francisco, if Trump’s Department of Justice wants to put pressure on the courts to continue the legal battle.
Although legal circles have some support to try to try to try to try, the more widespread theory between both liberal and conservative scholars is that it is a fight that will not win the president.
“I have been written,” said Jonathan Edler, a law professor at the Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, as there are many doubts about having any votes for the executive order of birth citizenship. “
Will Trump be ordered to freeze federal spending?
Trump’s attempt to freeze federal spending can now meet the resistance of packed and his call to close USAID, even before the conservative court, though the more slight reduction may improve. Is
“The court would be more doubtful, especially if the administration would try to fully open an agency by law,” said Michael Morrland, a law professor at Villanova University, who works in George W. Bush White House. Created. “
Edler said that the date of travel ban, which the court finally retained after twice revised, is about to teach.
“Make a wider declaration that is a bit of a blender, a little aggressive, which pushed the envelope forward. Then come back to the more defensive place after the pushback. The result is a bit more modest, but still dramatic.
The Biden administration considered the Congress a legally defable way of not spending money allocated border wall. Edler said, “There is a lot of games in couples than to recognize people.
The president’s option to fire is on a strong basis
The Trump National Labor Relations Board Member Guinea A. Will Cox and equal employment opportunities are on a strong basis in the removal of Charlot Bronze and Jaslin Samuels, All Democrats.
Will Cox has already filed a lawsuit, and has argued that the federal law protects him from being dismissed.
But even his lawyers acknowledged in his filing that his 90 -year -old could face the Supreme Court’s challenge for the example that Roberts and other conservatives were already tight. The case is known as the executioner of the Humphre that President Franklin Roosevelt cannot dissolve a member of the Federal Trade Commission, a decision that is applied to other independent federal agencies.
Although the decision has been adopted in the legal theory accepted by the conservatives, which states that the Constitution provides all executive power to the president, a person who is accountable to the entire US voters.
In the CFPB case in 2020, Roberts, aside, dismissed Justice Elena Kagan’s complaint that the court was eliminating “a measure of freedom from political pressure”.
Roberts left Humphrey’s executioner standing, but decreased, even Justice Clearns Thomas and Gorsuich wrote that they would move forward and remove it.
“If I had to make speculation, I would say that this will happen – if neither is not eliminated straight – at least strictly forced.”
