Study shows impact of foreign aid sanctions on maternal and child health

According to a new Stanford -led study, the reduction in government development aid could significantly increase the deaths of mothers, children and children, which reviewed three decades of restrictions on foreign aid. Researchers estimate that for five years or more, less resources are restricted to restrictions, which can make 64 % progress against maternity deaths, 29 % progress for newborns, and 26 % for children under the age of 5.

This study, which began in 2022, is the first of its kind to evaluate maternity and children’s health, especially the global impact of human health sanctions. The authors hope that government officials can use the results to better understand how foreign policy decisions affect the health of the local population, then take steps to minimize unnecessary humanitarian harm, including exemption of life -saving programs.

“Foreign policy can be strategic to pursue national interests, while also protecting the health of mothers and children through the Stanford Health Policy Post Documentary Fellow and,” Foreign policy can be strategic. ” “We used modern analytical methods to assess the effects of this target geopolitical tool so that we can offer clear policy recommendations for governments considering foreign aid restrictions or reduction in foreign aid.”

Appeared in the study Lancer Global health The growing foreign policy on the use of foreign aid restrictions cooperates in dialogue. The US Congress is considering ways to reduce the negative effects of relief sanctions, while the closure of USAID has led to an additional discussion on the elimination of foreign aid and its impact on health.

Collecting and examining the decades of decades

After more than a decade work on maternity and children’s health for foreign health ministries and humanitarian organizations, Gibson suffered serious losses that the approval of foreign aid was considered by women and children’s health and lives. In 2022, he regularly studied his impact as a post -docater scholar at the Stanford Center for Innovation.

Gibson and Stanford, Draclesal University, and a multinational team from the University of Washington, developed a study that analyzed the extent to which past aid restrictions affected maternity and child deaths between 1990 and 2019.

Along with the population measurement from numerous databases, the collection of a new dataset of relief restrictions for this study, the authors reviewed the relationship between relief restrictions, public development assistance, and children’s deaths, child and maternal mortality measures. He found sanctions on foreign aid that the country’s total health care costs declined by almost 2.4 % by a reduction in health aid. As a result, the mortality rate increased by 6.4 % for mothers, 3.6 % for children under the age of 5, and 3.1 % for newborns – which over the past three decades negate most of the progress made against maternity and child deaths.

To control for diverse variables

The team took special care to address other factors that could affect deaths in countries facing relief sanctions, such as changes in overall domestic products, war -related deaths and other restrictions. Using the sophisticated anometric analysis designed to prove modern relationships, they have taken numerous steps to overcome variables that can confuse the results and compare the approved countries with those who have never been approved. They provided open source files to test, copy, and use the effects of other foreign policies.

We believe that our work stands for careful application of acocoral methods and the use of novel data. We seriously give rise to the concern that the combination of conditions that prevent the implementation of relief restrictions can directly affect the deaths, so we have implemented a number of modeling techniques to avoid this effect with the actual impact of sanctions. “

Sebastian Bradley, Associate Professor of Economics at Draclesal University, senior author of the project and lead Economist

Life -saving policy intervention is recommended

Researchers also recommended policy intervention to reduce the impact of maternity and child health restrictions while ensuring national interests and security.

He presented health questions for any legislation, considering strategic changes in the promises of foreign aid. He also suggested an additional diagnosis for countries in conflicts, such as food insecurity and migration.

“In a world where the borders of the disease are not known, our national interests serve well by maintaining people’s health and stability in other countries,” said Michelle Barry, a senior associate of Stanford. “This new research suggests that we can create foreign aid in a strategic way that pursue national interests, while also harming the weak population.”