Will this be counted on the basis of wasting an opportunity? In recent weeks, in view of the rapid rise in militant violence, some people hoped that after a high -level hood on national security, there would be a message of hope and unity for those people and would be pledged to meet the threat of terrorism as a nation. Perhaps someone should be aware of the bitter dynamics of Pakistan’s ongoing political crisis, which will prevent this possibility. The major opposition parties finally decided to leave the meeting, diminishing the possibility of a united political leadership presenting a united front. The statement of the committee also revealed that matters have not been able to move forward “national consensus to repel terrorism,” [and] Emphasizing the strategic and united political commitment to counter this threat with full force of the state, the committee chose to leave the door open in its statement. […] Some members of the opposition regretted the lack of participation and reiterated that the consultation process would continue in this regard.
Meanwhile, both the government and the opposition deserve censor. First of all, it was wrong to make a person a central issue at a time when the Tahrik Tahros-Constitutional Alliance was deployed at a time when the militancy was deployed. The points raised by PTI and TTAP leaders can be discussed, but they did not justify boycott of this important meeting. Legislators not only represent their political party, but also the people of the constituency where they are elected. That is why, in matters of national imports, political loyalty should be left at the door of parliament. He said, the government also deserves criticism for not showing much flexibility. The PTI left the meeting because he said he was not allowed to consult his founder before the meeting. Although the matter was not about political dialogue, and the PTI easily chose to attend a national security meeting, but the government should have made a strong effort to persuade the unpleasant opposition rather than criticizing non -cooperation. However, it is the government’s duty to reach its rivals in the interest of national unity.
Dawn, appeared on March 19, 2025
