Cnn
B (b (
Instead of taking judges from a national debate on abortion, as the Supreme Court’s opinion of 2022 is ending Roe v. wade Promised to doThe decision has released a new wave of legal questions – how to resolve disputes between the states, whether their abortion laws can be implemented outside their borders.
With such a dispute, abortion can soon be liked by more judges at the doorstep of the High Court.
Anti -abortion activists and affiliated state and local officials are planning cases that will be forced to collide. President Donald Trump’s newly certified attorney general Said Last week, she will “like to work” with a local prosecutor behind such a case.
This case, perhaps the most important example, is that Louisiana prosecutors have recently brought against a New York doctor who is alleged to have illegally suggested abortion pills used in the state. – The warrant is now out to arrest the doctor.
The crime was filed by Civil Processings Texas Attorney General Ken Picterson against the same New York doctor later last year, making similar allegations.
The top officials of the New York state have already expressed their commitment to the so -called Shield law of the state, saying they will not cooperate in the action against the doctor.
“It was always after the Dobs,” said Dean and Professor of Temple University Basley School of Law, citing the decision of 2022, referring to the focus on reproductive health law. roe. “Such divisions in states when allowing states to make abortion policies – and their state legislatures – about this tension about abortion or restriction.”
– .
More inter -state disputes may come. The abortion movement is expected to file wrong cases in the coming months, perhaps targeting providers or others who help women get abortion, whose partners are the state. Outside, abortion pills ended their pregnancy. According to John Seego, president of the Texas Right of Life, legal and legislative efforts are underway, such as outside state and after international groups, which facilitates access to abortion drugs in the states.
“Our direction is finally happy to see this confrontation,” said Sigo. “This controversy is really coming out, and there are many questions to answer … these shield laws – this legal strategy has not yet been tested.”
Courts are starting to draw some lines around a state abortion behavior out of their borders out of their borders, which is the transport of minors to obtain abortion without their parents’ knowledge. A Adho law that takes pregnancy out of the state is in the legal challenge in the legal challenge.
9th US Circuit Court of Appeal Said in December Adho can enforce aspects of the law on the physical movements of minors, but another part said that while targeting the “recruitment” of minors for abortion journey outside the state, possibly the constitution’s free speech Protection has been violated.
But new cases in Louisiana and Texas can bring cross -border tensions to the head, both are in a position to test the degree in which actors in the state of abortion in the states of abortion in these states of abortion states. The source can be targeted that can help them in these states. Borders end their pregnancy.
Numerous books about abortion law have been authored, “each of them is going to raise their legal questions, some of which are going to be a beautiful novel.” “None of which can be unexpected, because you know that the Supreme Court has an art to review the example.”
Running international stress is the transportation of drug abortion drugs, which the FDA approved for use in 2000 and now accounts for the majority of American abortion. One of the major focus on the abortion movement is cracking on drug abortion, which is under pressure from the Trump administration to put pressure on them to make abortion pills more available and a major case in Texas that is a nationwide. I am trying to eliminate drug abortion through television.
Visiting New Orleans last week, Attorney General Palm Bondi asked Prosecutor Tony Clayton behind the case, even if he would establish “help” “consistency” so “the states just not away from people in Louisiana just Can live.
Louisiana, a grand jury in Western Baton Roose, was charged with Dr. Margaret Carpenter, a New York provider late last month, alleging that she had aborted drugs through pregnant minors. The source was broken by the state law, which allegedly faced complications and ended. In the hospital.
Bondi said she would like to “work” with her, According to NOLA.com
CNN Bondi’s comments reached the Justice Department. But an option for the Trump administration will be to restore the implementation of the Commstock Act, which is a 150 -year -old ancient law that can be read as a prohibition of abortion drug shipment. Courts can still reject this interpretation, and Trump’s team has raised questions about whether it will be willing to take the move.
Texas’s civil processing is also facing a carpest, alleging that he violated the state laws that ban abortion drugs and banned it. Doctors have been licensed in the state.
These actions create the ability to decide six statistics against the doctor.
In any case, the New York Shield law can be forced to legalize. Among other things, the Shield Law prohibits New York law enforcement agencies from handing over someone to the delivery of halal health care in New York and cooperating with someone’s arrest. It also prohibits state officials from sharing information, issuing substances, or otherwise investigating such behavior.
According to legal experts, if he is requested to be extradited to a doctor, Louisiana may file a lawsuit against the New York state. Meanwhile, Texas proceedings against the doctor appear to be moving towards a pre -determined decision, and the matter is being heard on Wednesday.
Under the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution, the states need to enforce the final decisions presented in the courts of other states. But there is an exception called the “phenomena exception”, which some legal experts say may potentially be applied in the context of abortion laws. The Texas case also brings other claims against the doctor.
CNN inquiries from the carpenter were transported to the Abortion Alliance for Tele Medicine, a group of which he is a co -founder, which called the Louisiana case a “a series of threats that women’s reproductive health in this country. At risk of access to care. ”
The group said, “Don’t make a mistake, since the Raviwide was abolished, so we have seen a disturbing pattern of interference in women’s rights.” “It is no secret that the United States has a history of violence and harassment against abortion providers, and in danger of legal action against a doctor who provides safe and effective care, in danger. Should put on. ”
Louisiana’s prosecutor behind the case told CNN that the warrant was now a warrant for arrest, but he refused to outline the next steps, which his office was in weight.
Texas Rights Life President Seego praised Clayton’s decision to bring this case and told CNN, “District lawyer is very difficult to counter such a way like going on this path and access to shield rules or aid. ”
Nevertheless, he said, Texas’s civil case could present a more direct challenge to New York’s Shield rules, as Patton is bringing a wide case against the carpenter that refers to numerous laws, not state abortion Anti -pregnancy laws.
Pakston’s office did not respond to CNN inquiry. But in the December statement, the civil case filing, he said, “In Texas, we have a treasure of the health and life of mothers and children, and that is why doctors outside the state illegally And can not recommend abortion.
“There was some hesitation for some time about willingness to do so with people,” said Zegler. “And this hesitation is clearly gone.”
CNN’s Hannah Robinouts participated in the report.
