At first glance, Gafer Mining is not a remarkable thing about the PLC. It seems that it is just another billion pound corporate giant, which has the interests of the London headquarters in Canary Ghat and from Tibet to Ukraine.
Its long financial accounts are filled with details of minerals weight, rare metal assets and research projects.
Nevertheless, the innocent multi -nation is not something that looks. In fact, it is linked to a very real effort to control a gold mine of Ukraine’s gold, along with a strange plan to invent a new nation.
Now the matter is being held as a good example of how the rules of the government register companies of the companies, how the government registers of the companies, are creating possible fraud opportunities in the UK and the whole world.

Gafar Mining has not registered accounts for many years after a close inspection. One of his directors is listed as a “Commonwealth Duke”. With a little and digging, things take more amazing turns. It seems that the same director has announced his own country.
The Union State of the British Commonwealth, which is a clear reservoir of citizens of countries, including the UK, China and Russia, claims it has already issued 10 million passports.
Like many circle powers, it also comes with its central bank and the Supreme Court. A series of UK MPs and peers is listed among his colleagues, According to its website. It has its own currency – the Commonwealth Pound – and its leader, and its leader, is said to have landed from a Russian prince along with the Greek royal family, and personal But the public has given about 29 292bn in assets. .
The Union State can be written as a curious online fantasy of its cunning founder, known as many names, including Michael Roorch.
However, a detailed analysis of the accounts filed in the house of Gafar Mining companies, for which they are registered as Director and Chief Financial Officer, suggest some more disturbing – that is, these accounts have been declared false.
It is still revealed that Gafer Mining was involved in a long attempt to control the Ukrainian Gold Mine, finally blocking the Ukrainian courts in 2020.
Those who live behind this effort even managed to advertise it PositionWrongly saying that Gafer Mining Barclass Bank was formed and the MB will invest in M 250M.
Observer It is learned that in 2019 the British Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce contacted the companies’ house to warn it about Gafar mining activities in Ukraine. He wrote, “People behind this inappropriate possession are using the list of Gafar companies’ homes online.”
Campaigners say the widespread issue highlights how weak checks and implementation lack of implementation have been allowing suspicious directors and companies to find books in the house of companies for years. They compare the UK companies with a “wildwest” register that makes life easier for potential fraudsters.
“Gafar mining accounts are at another level,” said Dan Nedal, a former senior senior lawyer and founder of the Tax Policy Associates Think Tank, who is investigating fake companies and fake accounts in companies’ homes.
“There is nothing in the accounts that are definitely alarm bells, unless you reach the auditor. Someone has faked the audit.
Needal discovered that the recent accounts of Gafer Mining were audited by a company called Smith Barclays LLP – this is a firm that is connected to itself. No trace of the designated auditor, James Whitelao.
Meanwhile, there is no evidence of 4,000 alleged employees of Gafar Mining. His canal warfer address is also incorrect. Still, despite all this and its involvement in the Ukraine Gold Mine case, Gafar Mining is a living company.
Despite being a major multinational, its competition has not ended, with the last filed accounts covering 2019.
In fact, Gafar Mining was found to be associated with a complex network of current, inactive or inactive companies that collectively sit in the balance sheets or shares.
Another such business was now a defective British Technology Bank, which falsely claimed that it was partially owned by the Bank of England.
In 2023, the Financial Conduct Authority Issued a warning That it is providing financial services or products without its permission and targeting people in the UK.
One of the several directors of Guofer Mining, Raireich said he owns the company’s “less than 1 %” and is controversial that his accounts have been wrong.
After the newsletter advertising
When contacted from ObserverHe said he and his associates were “not attackers but attackers” and had taken legal action in the European court of human rights.
He said, “You are right that Gafer has no concrete image in the UK, nor does he have any solid mark, but you are wrong that he has no other image.” “It is a company that has hijack assets by criminals.”
To support his case, he provided documents from an organization called “British Office for Ukraine”, which claims to be an “freely non -governmental department”. However, it is believed that Ukraine has no British office with real links with the UK government.
Labor’s Monday Charlie Falconner, who is listed as the chair of a committees, has never heard of it, nor has any affiliation with it.
Asked if he accepted that Gafer Mining’s desired auditor was not Whitlav, and had never been a authorized chartered accountant, Raierich said: “Yes, I accept, as far as I know.”
He said that the alleged auditor of Gafar Mining, Smith Barclass LLP, was now dissolved and he had never signed any documents as an accountant and/or auditor.
The purpose of forming the Union State of British Commonwealth and its affiliated Central Bank and the Supreme Court is not clear.
Several former and seated parliamentarians have been included in its “people” on its website. One of them is former Chancellor Nadeem Zahawi. He confirmed that he had a “zero knowledge” about it and would inform the “authorities and my lawyers”.
Nedal said the company requires proper enforcement of the law, especially around the clear ease with which incorrect information can be filed in the companies’ house.
“The fact is that we are such a business center, we make a clear target for the fraudsters,” he said. “The fact that companies’ home is so open and works so well makes it a juicy target – and the lack of control makes it a juicy target.
He said that there is a need for some serious thinking around him, when you see audited accounts at the companies’ home, the auditor has a license and he has a license. Right now, it’s a wild west – and it does not have a sheriff.
The Companies House said it took the allegations of fraud against the register seriously and “all the allegations are fully investigated”. He said the body was already using new powers that came into force last year to “quote the information provided by companies and to eliminate the misuse of the register”.
“Where, where false, suspicious, or fraud is filed, we will take appropriate action,” he said. “We actively share information with other relevant government agencies and law enforcement agencies.
We are developing Systems systems and processes to enable more checks to determine the accuracy of the information provided to us before being placed on the register.
“We will introduce new and existing directors (and its equivalent), prominent control people as well as identification checks for those who enter information in companies’ homes.
“This will make the UK more assurance of setting up, running, running and controlling companies in the UK, and will create an anonymous corporate structure that makes crimes, corruption and fraud far more difficult. “