• Appeal has been demanded to abolish its sentence
N NAB accuses NAB of stopping critical evidence, failing to present witnesses from the NCA
ISLAMABAD: Former Prime Minister Imran Khan has raised several objections to the decision, which has sentenced him to $ 190 million in corruption, which cited the flaws of the important procedure, the National Accountability Bureau (NAB). The misunderstanding of the evidence of political hunting and the allegations of political hunting was cited.
The appeal calls for his conviction and the end of the 14 -year sentence, emphasizing a lack of credible evidence and procedure errors.
Mr Khan’s legal team, headed by Barrister Salman Safdar, highlighted important points in the appeal, including the results of the decision on the UK court appeal on November 26, 2021.
The verdict presented by Lady Justice Nicola Davis, Lord Justice Nouga and Lord Justice Snowden made it clear that the funds at the center of the dispute were neither income nor linked to any illegal activity.
The appeal states that the National Crime Agency (NCA) in the UK agreed to a settlement of $ 190 million with property Tikone Malik Riaz Hussein, stating that the funds were part of the legal framework. But Pakistan’s Supreme Court account will be transferred.
Mr Khan’s appeal has accused NAB of stopping critical evidence and failing to testify to the NCA or relevant documents to prove his claims. His legal team identified the closure of NAB’s first case in 2020, following the NCA settlement agreement, and argued that the reopening of the investigation in 2023 was done for bad faith and political reasons.
The appeal also contested the authenticity of the privacy work presented by the prosecution. Mr Khan’s lawyers argued that the document has been confirmed, no forensic analysis has been done to determine its authenticity. He further emphasized that this document is merely a procedure, which has no evidence to connect it to any criminal activity.
Mr Khan’s lawyers emphasized that no personal financial benefit has been established. The funds associated with the case were allegedly deposited into the account of the legally registered trust Al -Qadir University Trust, which is about to promote education.
The appeal states that “his evidence of the prosecution confirms that Imran Khan or his wife did not personally receive any donations or financial benefits.”
Defense also criticized the trial court for ignoring key evidence and procedure security measures. The appeal states that “the trial court failed to properly review the critical evidence, including the testimony of prosecution witnesses and official documents, which directly denied the allegations of misuse of authority.”
Mr Khan accused Nab of pursuing a politically motivated agenda, and claims that the bureau was selected by the bureau, while leaving several persons involved in the matter. His appeal states that “the prosecution deliberately refrained from affecting six other main accused, which raised serious concerns about the investigation of justice and integrity.”
Bashara Bibi, sentenced to seven years in prison, was sentenced to seven years in prison, claiming that the case against him was non -cooperative by politically encouraged and unmarried evidence.
In his appeal, Bashara Babi argued that the prosecutor had failed to help or help her husband or to help her that she was involved in the affairs of the Al -Qadir University Trust.
The testimony of the Chief Financial Officer (PW -5), he emphasized clearly, confirmed it, confirming that neither she nor her husband confidence or any related transactions. Has benefited financially.
Dawn, appeared on January 26, 2025
