Cnn
B (b (b (
King County, Washington, and Portland, Oregon, and New Heven, and the cities of New Haven, Connecticut, as well as the counties of San Francisco and Santa Clara in California have accused the Trump administration of accusing him of accusing him of sacred. The authority is threatened and targeted illegally. A case has been filed in the northern California district.
The case filed on Friday cited President Donald Trump’s executive order, which directed federal funds “will be stopped from the powers to use his local resources to perform his immigration agenda. Refuses, “and on February 5, the Department of Justice Memo alleges that there are no allegations that the case is not an end to the financing, but any jurisdiction on any jurisdiction. Refuses to comply.
The plaintiff says his case tries to “examine this abuse of power”, and asks the court to declare the Trump administration’s actions illegal and stop his implementation.
CNN has arrived in the White House for comment.
“The federal government is illegally emphasizing the right to use its resources,” said David Chew, a San Francisco City attorney, David Chew. Do, and make local law enforcement commanders. ” He said the federal government forces local officials to turn their own or to face defamation or legalism. It is illegal and authoritarian.
In its legislature, the alliance claims that the Trump administration’s actions have violated the 10th amendment, separation of powers, the spending clause, the fixed process clause and the administrative procedures, how the agencies developed policies. Some guidelines set the rules for this.
The legalism states that “by clearly ignoring the law, President Trump once again tried to command these people, force local authorities and carry out their agenda.”
This is not the first time that San Francisco has taken legal action against the Trump administration on the city’s policies. In 2017, the city filed a lawsuit against Trump on an executive order, disqualifying the jurisdiction of shelters for the federal grant. At that time, a federal judge issued a permanent order in which the order was blocked.
Chi said there are not many differences between 2017 and 2025 The legislature and the mentioned Trump are “restoring the original executive order.”
“But in addition, he is now threatening local officials, state officials to investigate, criminal and civilian legal action.”
City Attorney said San Francisco was already taking legal action instead of waiting. The administration’s case against Chicago, Cook County and Illinois last week was a clear indication that the implementation of Trump’s policies is now a reality, Chew said.
The Trump administration’s case is the first major challenge by the administration against the democratic -led cities and states, which has opposed the use of local law enforcement agencies to help the federal government implement civil immigration laws. Trump officials have repeatedly criticized policies that often connect Chicago, where the administration recently conducted an immigration enforcement operation.
“From our point of view, we understand that any and all sanctuaries will be targeted,” he said, adding that he expects the administration to add further jurisdiction in legal action. Will be
CNN’s Illino Grif contributed the report.
