More than 40 cases have been filed in recent days by state attorney generals, unions and non -profit, President Trump tries to set up a blurk in the federal courts against the bulletzakrig, which most of the federal government. Has promoted and challenged the constitution system to check and balance.
Contrary to the inauguration of Mr Trump’s first term in 2017, there was little resistance to the streets, Congress halls or his second term in his own Republican Party. Right now, at least, lawyers say, there may be a judicial branch.
“The courts are really frontline,” said Sky Perryman, chief executive of Democracy Forward.
The multi -faceted legal pushback has already been obtained quickly – if possible if it looks like a fleet – results. In nine federal court cases, judicial orders, for a time, will be partially bound to the administration’s goals. These include eliminating automatic citizenship for children born in non -documentary immigrants on US soil. Transfer transgender women prisoners to male prisons; Possibly exposing the identity of FBI personnel, who investigated the attack on the capital on January 6, 2021. Cox to accept federal workers under the tough deadline to accept “delays resignation”; And freezing a maximum of 3 trillion in domestic costs.
The judiciary’s response to legal challenges continues in the weekend. On Friday afternoon, Judge Carl Nicholas, a district judge, was nominated by Mr Trump. He said that the US Agency for International Development will issue a temporary prevention order to stop the administrative leave of 2,200 employees and almost all workers from abroad.
In addition, on the end of Friday night, President George W. Bush’s Judge John D. Bits rejects an application to prevent Elon Musk’s team from accessing the Labor Department data by the union’s alliance Done Although the matter continues, Judge Bits’s decision was the first victory for Mr Trump’s new administration in the federal court. Earlier on Saturday, US District Judge Paul A Angel Mayor, a nominated candidate for President Obama, restricted the payment of the Treasury and the data system through Mr Musk’s official performance program, saying that by access. ” There will be a risk of irreparable loss “.
Judges do not have words made. In Seattle last week, a district judge issued a second order across the country to stop Mr Trump’s universal Birthday Right Citizenship. “The constitution is not something with which the government can play a policy game,” said Judge John C. He added that such a change can only be made by amending the constitution. “This is how the rule of law works.”
But while the executive branch has been given sharp, decisive action capacity, but the judicial design is slow through the design, and the legal opposition to Mr Trump’s opening measures can struggle to maintain their obstruction fire hose. Is
California’s Attorney General Rob Bonta said in an interview on Friday, “Last night I was listening to a conference call in a mine in a mine in a mine with my family and was trying to become a father at the same time.” “It’s hard work, but we are not asking anyone to feel sorry for us. This is what we have signed up to do.”
Mr Trump’s first three weeks have recovered a number of executive orders to promote US foreign aid, domestic spending and social policy, many of which are openly appreciated by the current law. Without purchasing or consulting with the government’s legislative branch, the president eliminates some parts of the government, eliminating the rules and regulations of civil service, eliminating more than a century of immigration law for more than a century. Unilateral executive power has been used in an attempt to do, the potential revenge on its enemies, and overtake the liberal progress made in diversity and equality and transgender rights.
Oregon’s Attorney General, Dan Ray Field, said in an interview, “No president should be able to rewrite more than 120 years of the constitution’s interpretation with a pen stroke.” “This is an existential threat.”
Some legal experts deliberately see the executive branch to overcome the boundaries of the legal status as a naked strategy to overcome the president’s opposition and eventually win some of the conservative Supreme Court’s scattered decisions As a bare strategy.
“It seems that the administration wants challenges that use a ton of resources,” said Judith Rescue, a professor of Yale. The attention of opponents, courts and the public – even when members of the administration know that these provisions The law is not linked to which it exists. ” La school.
For Mr Trump’s supporters, the President’s orders are in the powers of the Constitution in the Executive Branch. They say it is a judicial push, which is promoting the constitutional limits placed in the third part of the judiciary.
“President Trump is not stealing the powers of other branches,” said Mike Davis, head of the Conservative Advocate Group, Article III Project. “They are using their Article II powers under the Constitution. And the judge who says he cannot? They are legally wrong. The Supreme Court is supporting Trump.
White House officials say Mr Trump’s victory in November was a mandate to use extraordinary force.
“Every action taken by the Trump Vince administration is fully legal and federal law,” a White House spokesman, Harrison Fields, said in a statement. “No legal challenge against it is nothing but an attempt to weaken the will of the American people.”
In fact, it should be for the courts to determine that – if Mr Trump adheres to his decisions. On Friday, the Democratic Attorney General returned to court Demanded that a federal judge enforce The prevention order, which was to put billions of dollars in the Federal Grant Fund. He said the Trump administration did not comply.
The final decisions will not come at any time. Judge Cofiner’s ruling has blocked the executive order for the elimination of automated citizenship for children born on Mr. Trump’s US soil, the Department of Justice has already appealed to the US court’s appeal for the ninth circuit.
It may take months through the trial court, in the appellate courts, and then in the Supreme Court. Some legal scholars say that these long battles will be political and legal, which presents a president who, with his ambitions, almost as an unprecedented leader of the populist movement against the general of lawyers, with his ambitions. Sees
“The lawyers general took action quickly. If they eventually prevail in court and in public opinion, they will get political profits to defend their citizens’ rights and rights to their rights.
Mr Amar added that if the lawyers generals are using a campaign against Mr Trump to burn their political future, this is also through design. “Our constitution was designed to counter ambitions,” he said. “Likewise, the framers produced a blueprint.”
Those who follow the cases say they are surprised by the work forward. Parallel efforts by the Democratic Forward and the Democratic Attorney General have been underway to prepare for the second Trump presidency since the early 2024. Now, after midnight to prepare complaints in response to the latest administration’s actions, the plaintiffs are slowly steadily pursuing after midnight. For most parts, the Attorney General has presented a united front, in which the last minute to decide is the occasional josel running, and who will get the top billing as one of the leaders of this case , And where will it be filed?
An amazing element? Elon Musk, a billionaire businessman who has been handed over to the powers of cutting and reorganizing the government, unusual – and possibly illegal -, with no real title or Senate confirmation.
New Jersey Attorney General, Matthew Jay Platin, called Mr Musk a “One Wild Card”.
“I am not sure that Trump knows what he is doing,” Mr Platin said about Mr Musk. “He is an unelected billionaire running around the government, which reduced the workforce in large quantities and behaved in any possible illegal ways.”
In legal filing, the Department of Justice Have been discussed Mr. Musk’s colleagues are working legally because they are detailed to the entire government agencies as employees and that they are under the auspices of the acting cabinet members.
The states have a “special disruption” as a plaintiff, a theory based on the 2007 Supreme Court decision. This theory, which has lost underweight in recent years, makes it easy for states to take legalism that their rights or the rights of their citizens have been violated. According to lawyers familiar with the lawyers’ efforts, claims against Mr Musk’s teams can be difficult for the states to apply the theory that works at the federal level and influence the states less directly.
But the shoe did not stop Judge Angle Mayor from siding, right now, in an attempt to keep Mr Musk’s teams out of the sensitive Treasury Department system, with New York’s Attorney General, and 18 other Democratic Attorney General Letia James.
They argued Giving access to the performance of the government will violate the constitution, and damages that the department relys on the department’s treasury to pay for children’s aid payments and loans.
“I think we are still in the middle of a constitutional crisis,” Ms James said, “Ms James said, when the trial was announced last week.
Yale Law School Professor Ms Rescue said that when she expects the legal system to be “flexible”, it was difficult for the judiciary to come at stake in the coming weeks and months.
“The power is the enmity of the US Constitution,” he said. “Whenever you enter the US Supreme Court, this point is in the exhibition, where words are associated with stones: ‘Equal justice under the law.”
Gena RussellFor, for, for,. Laurel Rosen HallFor, for, for,. Charlie savageFor, for, for,. Chris CameronFor, for, for,. Jessi Forten And Horobi Maco Reporting was contributed. Sams Hughes participated in the research.
