Daylight Savings Time (DST) is a practice that has been a part of American life for over a century. Every year, most Americans adjust their clocks twice—once in the spring to “spring forward” and once in the fall to “fall back.” This year, on Sunday, November 3, those who have been on daylight savings time for the last eight months will “fall back,” gaining an hour of sleep. However, this practice has been the subject of much debate, with calls to end time changes altogether growing louder each year. This article delves into the history, controversies, and potential health impacts of daylight savings time, providing a comprehensive look at this contentious practice.
Read More: Liz Cheney
History of Daylight Savings Time
Origins and Early Implementation
The concept of daylight savings time was first proposed by George Vernon Hudson in 1895 and independently by William Willett in 1905. The idea was to shift the clock forward in the spring to take advantage of the longer daylight hours and shift it back in the fall to return to standard time. The practice was first implemented during World War I as a way to conserve energy and maximize daylight hours for industrial and agricultural activities.
Evolution in the United States
In the United States, daylight savings time was established by the Standard Time Act in 1918. However, it was quickly repealed in 1919, becoming a local matter. It was re-enacted during World War II and observed from 1942 to 1945. After the war, the implementation of daylight savings time varied from state to state until the Uniform Time Act passed in 1966, which standardized the dates of daylight savings time but allowed for local exemptions if states or localities did not want to participate.
Current Practice
Since 2007, daylight savings time in the United States has started on the second Sunday in March and ended on the first Sunday in November. This practice extends the daylight hours in the summertime by pushing off sunset an extra hour, providing more daylight for evening activities.
Impact on Health and Safety
Disruption of Circadian Rhythm
Experts agree that the time changes associated with daylight savings time are detrimental to health and safety. The shift in time disrupts the body’s circadian rhythm, which is like our internal clock. Springing forward an hour in March is particularly hard on us, as it is associated with an increase in heart attacks and car accident rates for a few days after the change.
Permanent Standard Time vs. Permanent Daylight Savings Time
While many Americans would prefer to do away with time changes, the solution is not as simple as making daylight savings time permanent. According to Erik Herzog, a professor of biology and neuroscience at Washington University in St. Louis and the former president of the Society for Research on Biological Rhythms, permanent standard time is better for human health. Studies have shown that health impacts of earlier sunrises and sunsets are much better, as waking up naturally with the sun is far better for our bodies than having to rely on alarm clocks to wake up in the dark.
Regional Differences
The impact of daylight savings time varies by region. For example, Florida, where Senator Marco Rubio has championed the Sunshine Protection Act, is much less impacted by the negative effects of daylight savings time because it is as far east and south as you can get in the U.S. In contrast, people in a state like Minnesota would have much more time in the dark in the morning if daylight savings time were made permanent.
Political and Legislative Efforts
Federal Legislation
The debate over daylight savings time has reached the federal level, with Senator Marco Rubio of Florida leading the charge to make daylight savings time permanent nationwide. The Sunshine Protection Act, which passed the Senate in 2022, aims to end the practice of changing clocks twice a year. However, the bill has not made progress in the House of Representatives, despite being introduced during multiple legislative sessions.
State-Level Initiatives
Several states have adopted or considered legislation to make the switch to permanent daylight savings time, pending Congressional approval. As of 2024, 19 states have passed laws or resolutions to move toward daylight savings time year-round if Congress were ever to allow it. These states include Colorado, Kentucky, Alabama, Georgia, Minnesota, Mississippi, Idaho, Louisiana, Ohio, South Carolina, Utah, Wyoming, Delaware, Maine, Oregon, Tennessee, Washington, and Florida. In California, voters approved a ballot initiative to allow their legislature to pass such a law.
Complexities and Contingencies
Some states have made the provision contingent on neighboring states doing the same thing. For example, Idaho, which is split into two different time zones, passed a measure that would make the switch to daylight savings time in the northern part of the state only if neighboring Washington does so. Delaware’s law would enact daylight savings time year-round only if Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Maryland also do.
Public Opinion and Preferences
Polls and Surveys
Public opinion on daylight savings time is divided. According to an October 2021 Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll, about 43% of Americans want year-round standard time, 32% want permanent daylight savings time, and 25% want to stick with the status quo. This division highlights the complexity of the issue and the need for a solution that balances the preferences and needs of the majority.
Health Experts’ Recommendations
Health experts overwhelmingly agree that permanent standard time is the best option for human health. The medical and scientific communities are unified in their belief that the body’s circadian rhythm is better aligned with standard time, which provides more natural daylight hours and reduces the need for artificial lighting.
International Perspectives
Global Observance
The United States is not the only country that observes daylight savings time. Most countries observe some version of “summer time,” particularly in the Northern Hemisphere, where Europe and North America are the primary adopters. However, not all countries observe daylight savings time on the same schedule as the U.S.
Southern Hemisphere
In the Southern Hemisphere, countries that observe daylight savings time have reversed start and end dates from those in the Northern Hemisphere due to the swapped seasons. This variation highlights the global diversity in the practice of daylight savings time.
Historical Trends
According to the Pew Research Center, only about a third of all countries currently observe daylight savings time. At one point, about half of all countries observed the practice but no longer do, reflecting the changing attitudes and needs of different regions over time.
Conclusion
Daylight savings time is a practice that has been a part of American life for over a century, but its future is uncertain. The debate over whether to make daylight savings time permanent, revert to permanent standard time, or continue the current practice of changing clocks twice a year is ongoing. Health experts, politicians, and the public are divided on the best course of action, but one thing is clear: the current system is not without its drawbacks.
As the debate continues, it is essential to consider the health and safety implications, public opinion, and the potential benefits of a more stable time system. Whether daylight saving time is made permanent or abolished, the goal should be to create a system that promotes well-being, reduces disruption, and aligns with the natural rhythms of the human body.
