President Donald Trump is ignoring the law established to overcome federal spending and the Congress is just letting it happen.
Judge stops the interval on President Trump’s federal aid amount
A judge stopped the order to “temporarily pause” some of Donald Trump’s federal aid by at least February 3, when there is another hearing.
Courts have blocked President Donald Trump’s spending, which has led to a first blow to a plan to use Executive Power to prevent Trump’s spending.
The basic problem hindering the Trump administration’s plan is that the president is obliged to spend funds allocated by Congress. This is something in which Trump has been in open enmity.
The Trump administration is once again pushing for the boundaries of the law to the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, it is unlikely that the court will rule it. It was at least twice in which a judge ruled against Trump. It may not be the last.
Trump may not refuse to spend upright, but he will continue to try
For those who are unfamiliar with the US budget process, Congress has The powers of the purseThat means lawmakers have to decide how much they spend and on whom. It is the President’s responsibility to facilitate the costs and make sure that funding reaches its desired destination.
You can ask, “What if the president only chooses to spend money on the goals that he dislikes?”
This process, Referred to as the ImpoundIt can be unconstitutional and is resolved by legislation. Impound of Control Act (ICA) calls on the president to inform Congress about the proposed funds for 45 days, and Congress must confirm that if the funds are withheld.
However, an important warning is that the Act is not obliged to provide an opinion to the Congress. If the Congress easily ignores the request for impression, the funds should be released after 45 days. Presidential assistance under the ICA, therefore, works more to Congress as a recommendation.
Before becoming president for the second period, Trump indicated That his administration will have a dissatisfaction with the ICA, and his actions have so far indicated that he is trying to address the Supreme Court.
The Congress should vote for these presidential diseases in a timely manner, as the purpose of this process is to work. However, lawmakers have no incentive to do so. The Congress -controlled Congress, this system, is working in its favor, and can allow Republican Trump to set up funds for 45 days at a time.
However, withholding of funds for 45 days without Congress action could cause problems for agencies who rely on specialization. Some experts have given this advice Congress should amend the ICA Demanding lawmakers to vote on presidential diseases on one way or the other, but the lawmakers do not usually want to create more work for themselves.
Possibilities are likely to be a question for the Supreme Court
The judges had stopped freezing Trump’s initial costs, and if Trump refused to spend more funds, Swift would be prosecuted.
As usual, the potential result is that the Supreme Court will be entrusted with the responsibility of sorting the mess between the Congress and the executive. So Trump can insist that he has the power to withhold funds unless the Congress is doing anything.
Democratic lawmakers have argued that a Supreme Court case has been demanded Train vs New York City Even without the relief control Act, the presidential aid has already ruled the unconstitutional. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in 1975 that the head of the Environmental Protection Agency could not withhold the funds allocated to the states by the Congress, and they serve as an important view.
There is another reason to believe that the Supreme Court does not agree with Trump’s claim that the president has a constitutional right.
In the opinion of 2013, After that Judge Brett Cowan wrote That “a president sometimes has the reasons for a policy of spending less than the whole amount allocated by Congress for a particular project or program. But in these situations, even the president has no unilateral authority to Instead, the president must propose to release the funds, and the Congress can then decide whether to approve the recovery bill.
Chief Justice John Roberts expressed his sympathy for the post 1985 Memo But not in the real matter.
With the liberal judges, and its spreading historical consensus among conservative judges, the Supreme Court is unlikely to know that Trump has the authority to withhold the funds allocated by Congress, If a case arises in front of them.
Once again, the Supreme Court is likely to deal with Trump’s efforts to stop the Congress. It is likely that the court will be able to decide to reduce the costs of the Congress and to do its job in telling Trump and has no power over the purse.
Des Potos is a voting column for USA Today and graduates from Daul University with a degree in political science.
