The legal war against the snowstorms of President Trump’s executive measures is intensifying, with new legalism and fresh orders emerging day and night.
The judges are already making their identity: By the week, eight orders have temporarily stopped the president’s actions. Other matters have not been decided. It does not matter that the preliminary orders of the judges, many decisions can be appealed, and some may reach the Supreme Court in the coming months.
There is a defect on dozens of suits. The ranks of litigation come into four important types.
Migration
The Trump administration’s crackdown on immigration – both legal and illegal – has resulted in at least 10 cases, seven of which challenge their executive order that cancel Universal Birthright Citizenship – Two groups of state attorney general representing pregnant mothers, and Orange County, California lawyer, who are representing their pregnant wife, are representing their pregnant wife.
So far, the judges of these cases have expressed skepticism over Mr Trump’s move, which has issued two preliminary orders that have put the president’s order on the snow. But in front of one of the trials justified, Colombian district judge Timothy James Kelly, which was nominated by Mr Trump in the bench.
In other cases against the president’s immigration policies, the authority of immigration agents has been challenged to enter the synagogues. A memo that accelerates and expands the scope of deportation. And an order that makes it difficult for refugees to claim political asylum in the United States. On Friday, San Francisco and other cities have filed a lawsuit to stop an executive order that prevents federal funds from cities that do not assist in implementing the Trump administration immigration policies.
Budget goes to the gym and firing
This category of litigation will increase as the administration seeks to emphasize its control over federal employees, potentially lay the foundation for widespread firing, and to prevent the costs of allocating the first allocation by Congress.
Mr Trump’s attempt to freeze a maximum of $ 3 trillion in federal funding continues in two cases, a non -profit group has filed a group of democracy, and the other a group of 22 state attorney generals. By The effort to stop the United States agency for international development is also at least partially.
Of the administration ”Fork in the streetOn Thursday, a Massachusett judge was sent by email by the government’s office for personal management, sent by the government’s office for personal management by email, encouraged him to resign, blocked it. Done.
Three legislatures challenge Mr Trump’s efforts to restore civil service, eliminating job reservations from tens of thousands of employees and if they “fail to enforce the administration’s policies loyalty. They give the White House a unilateral firing authority.
The other legislature challenges the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismiss the member of the National Labor Relations Board, which is one of the numerous agencies, which is believed to be free from the executive branch. A case has just contracted to do so to prevent Elon Musk’s team from accessing sensitive data in the Treasury Department.
Transjender Rights
Two litigation has been challenged by the Trump administration to transfer transgender women to men’s housing, and refuse to medical care for gender transfer. One of the suit ordered a prevention that would temporarily prevent a new policy.
According to a administration official, out of more than 1.5 million federal prisoners, there are less than 50 transgender women who live in women’s facilities.
Other cases focus on Mr Trump’s efforts to ban transgender people from serving in the military, refuses federal funding from hospitals to take care of gender transfer to people under the age of 19 There are, and transgender prevents people from revealing their identity to the United States. Passport
January 6 investigators
FBI agents and two groups of bureau employees filed a lawsuit on January 6, 2021 to prevent the names of agents and staff members participating in the capital riot investigation, which frightened Trying to be . On Friday, the government agreed not to issue the names, while the case was heard by President Biden, Jaya M. Cub, a district judge of Colombia.
Charlie savageFor, for, for,. Zach MontagFor, for, for,. Madelin NGO And Isleen Sullivan Reporting was contributed.
