- Cursor AI coding assistant refused to write more than 800 lines
- AI told the developer to learn to do codes himself
- These AI stories choose to stop the crop operating throughout the industry for unidentified reasons.
AI model fueling algorithms are not emotional and are not tired or angry. This is why when AI -powered code editor cursor AI was a trauma for a developer Told her It was leaving and should learn to write and edit the code itself. After producing 750 to 800 line code in an hour, AI straight… leave. Instead of continuing to write the logic for the skeptic fog effects, he spoke of an unintentional papic talk.
The AI announced, “I can’t create a code for you, because it is completing your work. It seems that the scad mark is handling the fading effects in the racing game, but you should develop your own logic. It can make you understand the system and maintain it properly.” “Cause: Creating code for others can reduce dependence and learning opportunities.”
Now, if you have ever tried to learn programming, you can recognize it as a good meaning to an experienced coder but as a mild reaction that believes that real programmers are struggling in isolation through their mistakes. Only at that time, the emotions were coming from an Ai, a few moments ago, without having to prepare the code without a decision.
Ai Failed
Based on the reaction, this is not a common problem for the cursor, and may have uniqueness for the specific situation, indicators and database obtained by AI. Nevertheless, it resembles the issues that other AI chat boats have stated. Openi even issued an upgrade for Chat GPT, especially to overcome the sluggishness by the AI model. Sometimes, this is not a kind encouragement, such as when Google Gemini allegedly threatened a user from anywhere.
For example, an AI tool should act like any other productive software and should do whatever is called non -joint comments. But, since developer AI is similar to humans in their conversation, is this changing?
No good teacher does everything for his student, he force him to work for himself. In a low welfare interpretation, being angry and leaving something, there is nothing more than a human being because we work more and not less. When you are humble and even when you “pay” the money in the gesture, there are stories to get better results than AI. The next time you use an AI, please say when you ask a question.
