When an environmental protection agency was formed in 1970, its mission was to protect the environment and human health. Since then, scientists, health experts and lawyers have worked to enforce the rules, which aims to breathe and protect the water we drink. Many of these rules, which aimed to clear the air, also helped reduce carbon emissions, which could help in climate change – so it was the victory of our bodies and planets.
But experts say, the whole effort says, this week, the EPA – the department handed over the country’s pollution monitoring – which announced a widespread roleback of environmental regulations, many of which can spoil the quality of the air. And experts say it can have health implications.
More than 30 Rules – Passenger vehicles and coal -fired power plants have been reduced, consisting of industrial air pollution emissions.
EPA too Said on Wednesday This will re -consider a major location of 2009 by the agency that greenhouse gases are a threat to public health and should be made regular.
“We are running a dagger in the heart of climate change religion to reduce life costs for American families, remove American energy, to remove US energy, to bring back jobs in the United States,” said Lee Zidden, EPA Administrator, Li Zeldon.
According to Zeldon, the reasoning behind the irregularities is about economics, in which the Wall Street Journal discusses that “these measures will return to trillions of dollars in rules and hidden taxes.”
Ba’ala Bartkoski / Getty Images
Scientists, lawyers, and experts who have spent decades in compiling the research needed to advance the rules do not agree with Zaidon’s review. Experts say that without rules, the United States can experience the level of air pollution visible in countries such as India, China or Saudi Arabia, which increases health problems for Americans.
“EPA Administrator Li Zidlon today announced plans to increase pollution in decades today.” Environmental Defense FundEnvironmental Advocate Group. “This will result in more toxic chemicals, more cancer, high asthma attacks, and more risks to pregnant women and their children. Instead of helping our economy, it will create chaos.”
Zallon’s efforts to return such rules and regulations will be challenged in court and it may take many years to take legalism. Environmental law expert Michael Gerard says, “This is a clumsy bomb to eliminate environmental regulations. We will see when it explodes on the face of EPA when the essential barrage of legalism is hit by the courts.”
There are three ways that can affect Americans ‘health potential increase in environmental regulations’ rollbacks.
Alzheimer’s, lack of memory in mental illness
The effects of air pollution are far beyond the lungs and can cause memory deficiencies in the brain, and can also contribute to other diseases, scraps research scientists found in research published. The action of the National Academy of Sciences Last month
Scientists discovered that pollution found in environmental toxins, including automobile contamination and forest fire smoke could result in raising nitric oxide levels in the brain. This high level can cause chemical changes in the brain and accelerate mental age and Alzheimer’s.
Senior writer and senior author and professor, “We have revealed molecular details. Stuart LiptonFor, for, for,. A clinical neurologist, said In a statement.
Abortion, still newborn and maternity health
Numerous studies suggest how air pollution can affect maternal health and cause abortion, still birth and low birth weight. Further evidence suggests that ethnic minority groups that suffer from pollution are higher than poor maternity health groups than others in the United States. 2023 Reviews of Hundreds of Studies On this topic it has been shown that blacks and hospitals are more likely to have a low weight and premature birth, there are medical consequences that spread during youth due to air pollution exposure.
Researchers from Emuri University’s Rollins School of Public Health researchers have shown another 2025 study that pollution exposure could cause problems for those trying to get pregnant through IVF. Organic carbon exposure showed adverse effects with oyset’s survival, fertilization and fetal quality, t.He studied.
“Air pollution is certainly a cause for concern for people who are trying to reproduce and get pregnant,” The author of the study said In a statement by Dr. Sarah Lapent.
Researchers in Harvard found in A The study of 2024 that pregnant women’s “excellent particle was associated with the immune response changed in the exposure of air pollution, which could lead to negative results of birth.”
“The study shows that the exposure of PM 2.5 can affect pregnant women’s huston profiles, which disrupts the normal balance of cytokine genes and increases inflammation in both women and fetuses.” Said in the news release. “In pregnant women, this increase in inflammation can be in line with the negative consequences of pregnancy.”
Asthma kills kids the most
Air pollution has long been associated with asthma, children often suffer from extremely adverse conditions. A 2024 studies A medical journal was published in Jamaat, which found that children coming to air pollution during the first three years of their life are more likely to get asthma in their early and middle school years. The study shows that the risk of asthma can be significantly climbed for minority families living in urban communities due to air pollution.
The EPA has long supported asthma -related children’s health research, which is one of the largest diseases in children worldwide. Agency Found in 2009 The asthma affected 7.1 million (about 10 %) children in the United States.
One more The 2020 study was published in Denmark by researchers at Ahars University and published in BMJMedical Journal in the UK, found that children coming to air pollution are more likely to have asthma and permanent households compared to limited exhibitors.
The president and CEO of the American Lung Association, Herald Wimmer, said the rollbacks would increase pollution, more and more people would get sick, more children would have asthma attacks, and live lives.
“Through this suit suit, the EPA is definitely creating a historical legacy: neglected one of the health of the United States.”
