As Congress Weighs a Spending Bill, Earmarks Are a Casualty

A connective museum was planning to produce its planet and observation. The Boys and Girls Club in Tennessee and Texas were ready to extend their guardian programs. A college in Georgia wanted to convert some part of his library into a business incubator, and at least two dozen airports in the United States were on the way to the renovation of their terminals and runway.

This year, the projects and several others who were ready to receive federal funds this year to seek federal funding saw that the money was suffering this week when Republicans rallied around the Stap Gap Government Fund extension to shut down midnight. The move, which approved the House on Tuesday and waited for a vote in the Senate, is keeping the current level of government spending at the current level.

This means that it does not include Airmarks requested by Congress members for individual projects in their districts and states. According to Congress assistants, when it comes to federal costs, according to the bucket reduction, the projects, along with projects, were about $ 13 billion.

At the beginning of President Trump’s second term, there is another way to lack him in which the Congress has abandoned the purse.

Lawmakers from both sides expressed regret over the death of Airmark, which left the community improvement and programs.

“I am sorry that not everyone got their plans,” Tom Cole, a representative of the Oklahoma Republican, told his colleagues at the House Chamber on Tuesday.

“I think most of them are worthy,” said Mr Coal. “I support them.”

The decision to put pressure on the Congress’s Republicans without any loss bills has come to the fore as they have achieved the Trump administration rapidly their institutional power.

Ever Marcus – now known as “Community Project Funding” in the House and is known as “Congress Expenditure” in the Senate – Individual members of Congress can emphasize their own costs, directing the Congress members to spend money on specific projects in their states and districts.

The programs that cover a wide spectrum, directly benefit voters, and offer some concrete to the lawmakers to present the evidence that they are getting the results of their constituencies.

This year, in the bills approved by the House and Senate customs committees, lawmakers directed the community to access the community’s access to programs that guide the programs of the Boys and Girls clubs or the big sisters of the Big Brothers. He extended it to the university’s research projects, police and emergency reaction centers, job training programs and community centers. And they sought federal funds to promote the score of airports, highways and transit projects.

But under the control of the Congress, the Republicans did not raise the bill and failed to reach the funding agreement with the Democrats to continue the government money before Friday’s deadline. It has stopped them to attract them to a temporary patch that leads to Ari Marx.

Democratic lawmakers pointed to the lack of Ari Mark as one of the many problems, which they saw in a measure of expenses, which they largely oppose.

“These projects are really important to societies,” said California representative Robert Garcia. He said the Republican was being treated shortly after failing to fund them.

“Some Republicans really like these plans,” said Mr Garcia. “I think it’s a shame that none of them stand for their communities, none of them are saying anything about these plans.”

Air Marks has a recent controversial history. For decades, they were dealt with bills to encourage lawmakers to make political votes politically in exchange for being able to send the federal money back home.

But critics have joins Ettor Mark as a serious pork or magnet for corruption. In the early 2000s, a series of scandals and high-profile projects that were too much in Alaska to “no more than the bridge” and now like a close-up tapot museum in western North Carolina.

Since the anti -spending tea party movement entered the Congress, lawmakers stopped it in 2011. But after 10 years, they returned with strict rules and more transparency, so that Congress members could be encouraged to advance the legislature spending.

Now the airx has been closed at 1 % of the overall arbitrary costs. The lawmakers must provide a public list of their requests and confirm that neither of them nor their family have financial interest in any of them.

There are still critics in the projects. Many fishermen were proudly avoided by conservative lawmakers, presenting them as evidence of official waste. Other misconduct raises concerns about the possibility of corruption or the scope of the projects involved. Even the lawmakers who have requested financial support for the projects have made the exercise ridiculed.

Representative Tim Bercht, a Republican who was in line to receive $ 7.5 million for his district in East Tennessee, said he essentially supported his shortage of government spending.

“I hope this will not hurt anyone,” said Mr Bercht, who sought funds for a guidance program for a law enforcement task for child abuse and plans in universities. “But we are on a loan of $ 36 trillion, and we have to tighten our belts.”

Don Bacon, a Republican Nebraska representative, who was standing to win $ 10 million, acknowledged that some of his constituencies were likely to be disappointed. But he was standing with the support of the spending move.

“I will prefer them.” “But I will not be closed instead, okay?”

Mr Beacon received 6 45.6 million for projects in his district in home spending bills. But he said he was expecting better luck next year.

“We are going to re -assemble most of them in the next cycle,” he said.

Maya Sea MillerFor, for, for,. Alana Marx And Jeremy singer Reporting was contributed.

Leave a Comment