Cnn
B (b (b (
Since the opening day, two words of President Donald Trump’s hundreds of social media posts have been paid special attention: “Illegal protests.”
He wrote in March 4, “All federal funding will be stopped for any college, school, or university, which allows for illegal protests.” True Social Post. “Angry people will be imprisoned/or permanently repatriated from where they came from.”
Linda McMemon told CNBC on Tuesday that this week’s new secretary of the country further analyzed the administration’s message about the protests on the US campus. “This is a problem of safety and civil rights.”
As the first amendment guarantees, the judges have ruled for decades that the right to protest is not infinite.
Trump’s guards acknowledge that it is not completely clear that he plans to explain “illegal protests”. And the White House has not responded to requests for CNN details as to which protest will be declared illegal.
The ambiguity of the president’s warning can pave the way for legalization. This can also be harmful, critics say, if it is to stop freedom of expression, it is in the country’s most basic and most rights rights.
“I think such a wide range of threats and protesters are about to have a cold impact on such a widespread threat,” said Gloria J. Brown Marshal, a professor of constitutional law at John J. College of Criminal Justice in New York. “A protest history of the United States.”
What to know about the right to protest in the United States here:
Protests are a fundamental part of the United States story, in which the constitution is predicted, when disguised colonies protested taxes by throwing tea in Boston Harbor.
The first amendment is unique within the rights bill, not only protects one but also five personal freedoms: freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of freedom press, “peace when gathering” and freedom to complain to the government.
Many of these freedoms are protesting. But like the promise of freedom that “all men are born equal”, the first amendment guarantees have not always been applied equally.
“Free speech and the right to protest as a manifestation of the rights of the peace assembly is a critical thing,” said Gregory Magarin, a law professor at Washington University La School in St. Louis, and I think it has always been a critical thing.
For example President Abraham Lincoln, Suspended Hub Corps Reservations for “unfaithful people” during civil war. 1918 Rebated Act During the First World War, the US government and the military have organized Kentucky coal miners for a “unfaithful, unconscious, abusive, or abusive language” for prohibited working conditions. Pressing In 1931, local law enforcement agencies and private security. And civil rights demonstrators – including the next Congressman – Brutally beaten In 1965, the state soldiers were ousted by the state troops and in the Salma of Alabama.
“Since Martin Luther King presented it so brilliantly, we have to protest for the right to protest,” Brown Morohal said.
But when the courts have found that law enforcement officers can stop a protest that has become violent or destructive, but before the judges have been very reluctant to stop the massive aggressive protests.
“There are boundaries on the right side of the peace assembly, but it is a strong constitutional protection,” said Migraine. “The idea of” illegal protest “is really contradictory.”
In 1977, the US Supreme Court Went to the reversal A state court’s decision in which nine Nazis wearing a sit -in will be forbidden to march in Skuki, Illinois, which contains a large number of people who have survived the Holocaust. American Civil Liberties Union Defense Nine Nazi groups, and the 5-4 majority of the court Governance“If a state tries to ban this nature, it will have to provide strict procedure security measures.”
Almost half a century later, nine Nazi protests in Columbus, Ohio complained loudly with claims by residents and government officials, with claims that the group deployed black pepper spray, but police finally announced that no charges were made.
“Constitution protects the first amendment activity, no matter how disgusting,” Said Columbus Division of Police Chief Allen R. Bright.
Brown Marshall said the protests could go beyond the leading photos of the markers, which have signs of Bill Horns. “There can be anything that happens, which requires people to stand,” he said. “This fast can be done by sitting.
In his first term, Trump expressed his hatred against the protesters, especially when the White House gates reached the street of social justice. Former Defense Minister Mark Asper said Trump suggested firing on protesters at Lafite Park.
“Can’t you shoot them? Just shoot them in the feet or something else? According to Sapar, Trump allegedly asked in June 2020.
Trump has refused to make these statements, and the protesters were cleared from the square with “low deadly weapons”. The President fired Through the tweet Immediately after losing the 2020 presidential election, and last month the details of the security of the Asper were canceled.
Trump’s 2025 statement was familiar with Magari, citing “angry people” protests.
“Historically, ‘angry’ is a word whose governments and other criticisms of protests try to paint politically voters somehow,” he said. “This tweet deepens my feeling that Trump is primarily declaring a war against political differences, or at least” or less. ”
When Josh Blackman, a professor of constitutional law at the South Texas College of Law in Houston, said a blanket warning about “illegal protest” is unusual, but Trump’s statement is so vague that he may not reflect his attempt to explain the first amendment.
Blackman said, “There is a lot of talk, as often with Trump, without any kind.” “We do not know exactly how it will shake.”
For example, a few days after Trump’s online warning about “illegal protest”, his department informed 60 colleges and universities that they were investigating “anti -mechanical harassment and discrimination.”
Separately, both Colombia And Harvard Universities have recently set a civilian cases filed by students, alleging that they had rescued Jewish students from Hamas’s terrorist attacks on October 7, 2023, on the campus, on October 7, 2023, after Hamas’s terrorist attacks and Israeli military response in Gaza.
“Now, I think the federal government can use these judicial cases as the basis for preventing financial support,” said Blackman. “I think last year, many schools thought that there was immunity – they had no results – but now they are seeing that the results can be yielded.”
Meanwhile, the president’s threat to deport the president is being tested in court, the government has tried to deport the Colombian graduate and Gaza’s pro -Gaza protestor Mahmoud Khalil.
Trump Trump Posted Monday of Khalil’s case.
The threatening exile of a legal permanent US resident Khalil was “activities associated with Hamas”, “Department of Homeland Security said on xBut federal authorities have not accused him of crime.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio this week, in addition to his efforts to revoke Khalil’s Green Card, also defended the policy of banning students’ visas from Hamas supporters.
“This is not about free speech. It is about people who do not have the right to start in the United States. No one has the right to a student visa. Rubio said on Wednesday, no one has the right to a green card.
“It is clear that the Trump administration is punishing Mr. Khalil as selected for expressing views that are not approved by mega-which is a terrible extent,” Is written Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, cited the slogan of Trump’s campaign.
He added, “Political speech,” should never be the basis of punishment. “
The growing commitment to breaking the protest is not just directed on ivory towers. Democratic Repert El Green was thrown out of the chamber after repeatedly interrupted Trump’s joint address in front of the Congress last week, censoring the House Republicans and some people in his own party.
Conservative House Freedom Cox at this time Is called Potential to snatch Green’s assignments of his committee, take a key bully and a car to affect the legislation, potentially.
“It needs real results to show that it is necessary to show that President Trump’s agenda from the tracks, said Andy Harris, Maryland’s GOP representative. Some Republicans have also expressed their interest in paying Democrats to remove Republicans from committees in the past.
Defending unpopular speech, according to praise, rarely gains greater support in a political point of view. In recent years is in the leftist groups Physically blocked or screaming Conservative speakers on the college campus that their scheduled speeches were canceled.
But the Americans are still determined to protest, at least in the general sense: 84 % of people in the United States agreed that “the right to gather peacefully” is very important or very important, a survey conducted by the Associated Press NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Found About a year ago
Steven Levittsky, a government professor at Harvard University, is hopeful that he will encourage people to rally in defense of the first amendment.
“In recent decades, the trend of both sides of the political spectrum has been the trend to appreciate the speech from the other side, and I think many, many Americans are coming to the feeling that this is a really bad idea.”
“They are returning to the idea that, yes, we really need to protect all speeches or we are about to lose it.”
