What to know about the Menendez brothers’ bid for freedom

Los Angeles (APP) – Los Angeles District Attorney says he Does not support anger Lyall and Eric Menandez, brothers who have spent more than 30 years in prison for killing their parents in the Bureali Hills’ house in 1989.

Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hachman said on Monday that the brothers had repeatedly lied why they killed their parents and became “short” in accepting full responsibility for their crimes.

The brothers have argued that they committed crimes in their defense after many years of abuse by their father.

Here are some things to know about the case:

What happened in the notorious murder case of 1989?

Jose and Kitty Minandes’ Shot Gun kills August 20, 1989In their Beverly Hills mansion. His son, Lyall Menandez, was the one who called 911, the brothers initially claimed that the killings were related to the mafia or their father’s business affairs.

The brothers forced to buy, spend, buy, cars and houses. Two months later, Eric Manandiz told his psychologist, Jerom Ozil that he and his brother killed his parents. He was eventually arrested and charged with his parents’ deaths.

The murder case draws public attention. On the heels of the OJ Simpson trial, the nation was hungry for true crime TV. The first case of the Brothers was almost one of the first to come to the court on TV on TV. It gave rise to documentary films, television special and dramatic. Netflix Drama ” Monsters: The story of Lyall and Eric Menandez ″ And the documentary released in the fall of 2024, “The Manendez Brothers” has been given a new attention to the issue.

What happened in court?

The first case of Lyall and Eric Menandez took place in 1993 with separate jurys. Prosecutors argued that they killed their parents for financial gain. The brothers’ lawyers never killed the couple, but argued that they worked their defense after years of emotional and sexual exploitation by their father.

Both trials resulted in the counting of all three counts for the plot to murder and murder of juice and Kitty Minds. The jurys were divided on the punishment of murder and massacre.

In the second trial in 1995, the judge excluded plenty of evidence presented at the first trial, including the testimony of several family members who witnessed or heard about abuse. The prosecution doubled his claim that there was no abuse. A jury sentenced the two brothers for three counts, including the murder of the first degree, in addition to the waiting and special circumstances. He was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1996 without parole.

What about the process of appeals?

In the years after that, the brothers repeatedly appealed for their sentences. In 1998, he was refused by the Appellate Court and the California Supreme Court. His petitions for Hub Corps, the court, be requested to examine whether anyone was being detained legally, the state Supreme Court refused.

After terminating his powers in the state court, he filed petitions in the federal court, which were denied. He then appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal in 2005, which refused him again.

His lawyer said that after failing the appeal, he resigned from herself to spend the rest of her life in jail.

How did the new evidence help brothers?

In 2015, these brothers heard their uncle Andy Ceno about the letter written by Eric Menandez, mentioned in Barbara Walters Television Special. When he asked his lawyers about it, the lawyers were unaware of the letter and they realized that it was not introduced in any case, which has effectively become new evidence.

Lawyers say the letter confirms the allegations that Eric was sexually assaulted by his father.

Former member of the Latin pop group Mando Rai Roselo recently came forward, saying that when he was a teenager in the 1980s, the boys’ father was subjected to drugs and abuse by Jose Minandes. The menodo was signed under RCA Records, whose juice Menandez was the head.

Rusilo spoke of his abuse in Moore’s documentary systems “Minds + Menudo: boys cheated.” He provided a signature announcement to the brothers’ lawyers, which requires the last piece of evidence required for them to file a new application for Habis Corps in May 2023 and request for a re -examination of the case.

Now what are the way they have for freedom?

The brothers have submitted a petition for the hubs Corps, asking the court to present them a new case in light of the new evidence presented.

The court is also considering a movement for the anger presented by George Gassan last October. Gaskin said his office would suggest that the brothers would get a new sentence at the age of 50, which they were immediately eligible for parole because they were under 26 years of age at the time of crime. If the State Parole Board approves his release, California Government Gwen Newsome has 150 days to review the parole board’s decision.

Finally, the brothers have asked Newsom to give them Claimens. Is the newsome Ordered the state parole board To assess if the brothers are released, they will be threatened to the public.

What does the current LA prosecutor say?

Huchman says he oppose the displeasure of the Minandes Brothers because of the “lack of full insights and lack of full responsibility for his murder”.

On Monday, her office announced that she was withdrawing the resentment movement presented by the Gaskan office. Huchman also said in February that he didn’t support it Brothers’ hub For a new trial.

Hutchman said the brothers had failed to “clearly” about these lies when they said that with the issue, their original claims were included that they did not kill their parents. He said that his repeated argument that he shot his parents in his defense is not similar to the facts of the matter that show his premature actions to plan the casualties and to look like a group’s hit.

He also said that the brothers did not admit that they tried to misunderstand their friends and lied about their mother that they were trying to poison their entire family.

What happens next?

According to former federal prosecutor and professor of criminal law at Los Angeles in Los Angeles, opposition to Hutchman’s displeasure, the chances of the freedom of the Menande Brothers significantly reduce the chances of freedom.

“Tell the truth that these are the details that have been presented in this long response,” Levenson said. A document consisting of 88 pages He was released through his office. “So far, the idea of ​​defense has been very high about the use of the court and the facts of the public.”

Former LA district attorney, Gaskin, referring to the resentment, pointing to the restoration of brothers in the jail, said that the trial will be treated differently from today’s understanding of how sexual and physical abuse affects children.

When prosecutors supported anger, there is a “some speculation” that the court will do, Levinson. Without this support, whether or not the court can move forward, there may be jurisdiction matters.

The re -hearing of the brothers has been fixed on March 20 and 21, chaired by LA County High Court Judge Michael Jesk.

“They will be most likely through the governor’s office and class,” said Levinson. “It is clear that Judge Jesus is likely to pay closely to all the facts presented in this opposition.”