Since the unions and the Democrats condemned the federal manpower through the purchase of the Trump administration workers, some social media users have said that former president of the president Bill Clinton is parallel.
LD Basler, a retired officer of the Federal Law Enforcement, wrote on the X, “For all of you who finished President Trump’s Bayout Program, I offer a piece of history to you.” Federal Work Force Reconstruction Act.
“I think Clinton didn’t even have the option, when he did it in the 90s? (Because) this view was arranged by the Democrats,” another X -user wrote.
Is that true?
Under Clinton, the government offered a massive purchase. But there is a significant difference between what is happening under President Donald Trump: a bilateral Congress overwhelmingly approved Clinton’s program after months of review.
On the contrary, Trump’s “delayed resignation” offer, known as a purchase as a conversation, came within a week of opening, which many uncertain about the terms. The situation was.
“We spent six months, included several hundred federal workers, and made hundreds of recommendations to Clinton and Gore, some of which they accepted, some they did not,” David Osbourne, Advisor to the Clinton era review. Said Shopping
The status and legal status of Trump’s program is not yet clear. The administration fixed the last date on February 6 to accept the offer to the workers, but a federal judge in Massachusetts stopped this deadline and heard on February 10.
The federal unions have filed a lawsuit and wrote that the administration has “not presented a legal basis for its extraordinary offer”. There are questions from the legalism whether the federal government will respect the commitment to pay the participants by September 30.
The US Office of Personal Management said 40,000 employees were offered by February 5.
The purchase under Clinton was created from Congress reviews and acts
In a few weeks of his presidency in February 1993, Clinton issued an executive order in which each government department or agency was told with more than 100 employees that at least 4 % of civilian positions in three years were three years. I deduce or reduce it through “initial programs”.
The Congress paved the way for purchase. In March 1994, Clinton signed the 1994 Federal Work Force Reconstruction Act, HR 3345. Wide, bilateral margin: 391-17 legislation approved in the House and 99-1 in the Senate.
In this legislation, the Department of Defense, the Central Intelligence Agency or the General Accounting Office (now called the Government Accountability Office), as well as the Executive and for the selected groups of employees in the judicial branches, the option of purchase up to 000 25,000 Is The law appointed a deadline on April 1, 1995.
Clinton said the project would be able to “reduce job” by 273,000 people by the end of 1999.
Clinton said in a statement, “After all the rhetoric about reducing the size and price of the government, our administration has worked hard and made a hard choice.” “I believe the economy will be strong, and the life of the middle class will be better, because we reduce the loss with such legislation.”
The law was a result of Clinton’s national performance review, which began in March 1993 with the slogan that “better and reduce the cost of government work”. Clinton appointed Vice President Al Gore to guide the review and issue a report within six months.
About 250 government employees of the career worked on the review and created recommendations with agency employees.
Not everyone agreed to the Clinton Gore action.
“Opposition,” but union leaders supported the power of middle managers, the target of most shortcomings, and reducing the growing role of unions in bargaining, “so they thought it was an acceptable trade”, ” John M. Comanski, Deputy Director of National Performance, told Polit Fact.
The Chicago Tribune wrote in June 1993, Gore visited the federal offices paid as “Town Meetings” but they are like group therapy sessions that allow workers to remove their feelings about their jobs Give “.
Gore’s September 1993 report also includes hundreds of recommendations, including shopping. Gore David went to the television show last night to promote the project.
“So, have you decided the government?” The letterman asked.
“We have found many funny things that cost a lot,” Gore said.
Gore brought the government out of the government’s purchase and read the federal rules and regulations on how to break the Ash Tree when he was released. Wearing safety springs, Gore broke the Ashri with a hammer.
Clinton “had a deep commitment to change, but it was not discouraged,” said Paul Light, New York University professor Emirates of Public Service.
To reduce Clinton’s efforts, Clinton created a “New Democrat” from his election campaign platform that said that the major government’s era was over, Allen Kumark said, who said Clinton Gore. He helped guide the review and is now the director for the Brookings Institution Center. Effective Public Management.
“We had a tech revolution that did not need so much layers of administration like the old days,” Kamark said.
How does the Trump administration want to reduce jobs
Clinton’s point of view tried to be surgical to determine which employees could be easily removed without compromising on the government’s overall mission.
In Trump’s point of view, so far, without the review period or Congress action, shopping and firing. On January 28, the Office of Personal Management emailed federal employees about “thorn in the road”. (Elon Musk, who heads Trump’s new department’s performance, used the same sentence in a staff message in 2022 after buying Twitter).
The email said that remote workers should return to work five days a week and have been presented “resignation in postponement”. The employees had to resign until February 6 and were paid by September 30 (until the judicial intervention of February 6). The email indicated that the holidays were possible.
About two million employees received this offer. According to the Pew Research Center, the civilian federal work force is about 2.4 million, which, according to the Pew Research Center, keeping the US postal service workers aside. The average annual salary is about $ 106,000.
Some workers, including the military, postal service employees and workers, were exempt from offering in immigration enforcement, national security and public security.
Conservative think tank, Heritage Foundation’s senior research fellow Rachel Griezer, has more generous Trump’s program than Clinton. Clinton’s offer, 000 25,000 is about $ 55,000 in today’s dollar. Trump’s plan states that he will pay people for about eight months, so the average salary of the average federal workers is the fact that it is high.
The Democratic Attorney General said that payments cannot be guaranteed and that united workers have been urged to follow the guidance of their union officials. Democratic senators gained similar concerns about the short window and Trump’s work to make employees decide.
Trump ordered the workers to be re -ranked so that they could dismiss them more easily – another article for litigation. Workers were kept on salary leave because of the order to eliminate federal diversity, equity and involvement (DEI) programs.
A reporter asked the White House press secretary Karolway Lweet whether the program was a way to purify the government of the people who did not agree with the president.
“That’s wrong,” said Levit. “This is a suggestion for federal workers that they have to come back to work. And if they do not do so, they have the option to resign. And this administration has been offering their payment very generous for eight months.
