WHen News broke the proposal of US President Donald Trump’s ousting Palestinians from Gaza and turning it into a “Middle East’s Rowera”, the world’s newsrooms were particularly different, different.
The New York Times called it a “bastard plan”, while Al Jazeera declared a bit firmly: “Trump is a crazy man.” The headline of the Guardian, and the “UN Chief Warning on the UN’s ethnicity” said the takeover plan “faces global condemnation”.
Sydney Morning Herald’s Splash called it “foreigner”. Foreign Affairs Representative Matthew Note said that Trump was advocating for ethnic cleansing and was preparing it as a “golden property unacceptable opportunity” and refers to experts that it would be a crime against humanity.
Unusually, the News Corporation pulled its maize a bit.
The Australian heading read, “Ultimate Gaza Gambut”. “Trump surprised the world with a war -affected stretch plan.”
The headline of a piece of foreign editor Greg Sheridon, “some way in madness,” reads. Sheriden wrote that this is “the most surprising, foreign, radical, surprisingly strange proposal”, but continued to say that Trump’s theory of the world “Naturally Sami” It was
Political editor Simon Banson called it Trump’s “latest crazy idea”, in which Prime Minister Anthony Albaniz should definitely respond.
Further in this article, the strategic analysis of Australia’s director, Peter Jennings’s opinion (which said “Khan Younis had the same opportunity like Snobal”, but a new approach was needed). The heading was: “Gaza takeover? It is worth trying, nothing else is doing.
The advertisement called it his “club -renovating rescue” while the Daily Telegraph went to “Stars and Stars” and “Trump for amazing Gaza Takeover”. “Two fellow solutions,” the courier fled.
The Cairns was sprinkled with the post, but on a close inspection, which was about the flood, which was responsible for the supermarket shelf, which had nothing but yellow fruits.
The whole truth
Ten years ago, the young nine newspaper reporters arrived at the lap of Nick Tusko and Bao Donley, who whispered that the famous welfare icon Belle Gibson – who claimed that he had a complete food to his brain cancer. He claimed to be fixed – he was not telling the truth.
That secret became a story that turned into a lot of things, then a book (a woman who fooled the world), who now influenced a new Netflix drama, Apple Cider vinegar, on February 6.
At first, reporters did not believe in the sign, which came from Gibson’s friend. “I felt the call very fragile, dismissed its claims,” Donley told The Edge and SMH. Morning Edition.
“But I got away from what she was saying.”
“He targeted me as someone who was very intelligent, and who was really scared for this role in supporting Belle Gibson, who now believed that he now believed that a cancer Was the Ficker. “
Tosano told the Morning Edition, “So, and I thought again: ‘Well, if she is lying about it then what else is she lying?’
His first story in 2015 revealed that the Instagram star had raised funds for a charity with his followers, but did not donate money. Gibson’s health claims – the foundation of its welfare business, kickbook (whole pantry) and app – then increased the scrutiny, and began to fall.
But Donley and Tosano told the Guardian in 2017 that researching their book is like extracting teeth.
At that time, Tosano said, “His name was poison.” “I can’t think of another story that I covered that people were so difficult to talk to me.”
Donley added, “We were closed by dozens and dozens of people. We were threatened with legalization by others. It was incredibly difficult.
Outfoxed
On Tuesday, Rupert Murdok appeared with Donald Trump at the White House’s Oval Office, while the US president praised the Australian-born non-agent media tycoon, which had a “amazing man”-though one, he said, They often disagreed.
This feeling is seemingly mutually, when Murdok reported Trump as a “fucking fool” on his immigration policy in 2018. Marduk called Trump’s actions “too much crime” on January 6, According to judicial documentsAnd the Republican tried to remove himself before returning to the fold after Trump’s clear leader came to the forefront.
After the newsletter advertising
But this time the disagreement ended on economic policy. The Wall Street Journal of Marduk described Trump’s proposed prices against China, Canada and Mexico in an editorial as a “stupid trade war in history”. Trump did not behave beauty with the feature, Writing on the truth social This: “Tariff Lobby”, headed by Globalist, and is always wrong, Wall Street Journal, Canada, Mexico, China, and many other people are trying hard to justify the name, which The United States has long been ongoing. “
But it seems that the two have succeeded in keeping their differences aside in the eleventh hour, withholding prices in Mexico and Canada. Globalist 1 – Trump 0.
Mardovch was in the White House to discuss Trump’s plans for billionaire Larry Allison, as well as Trump’s plans for the US sovereignty Fund, which he speculated that T -Tawk could be used to buy. If it goes ahead-a bigger if-you will be well-worked for any purchase (or advice) for any purchase, before the News Corporation’s Mai Space Judge of the News Corporation in 2005 Was bath with the acquisition. The platform was at one point at a cost of $ 12bn, but the news corporation sold it for $ 35 million in 2011.
Mention of war.
Former foot boy Sam Newman, a man who was not known to get away with anger, previously seemed to be that he had no quality hosting Right -wing extremist Blair Cotterl and Thomas Seoul After a picture posted on X on its podcast, Koams came later, showing all three, Response.
Then Newman insisted that he did not support his thoughts in any way, and changed Cotteriel, and it was “interlipper”, a “opportunist”, a “24 -Carrot Gold Scumbag” and another The podcast was declared a “Star Fokker”, which was released. Wednesday.
Listen to the interview in the first podcast, he insisted, because it shows that I am not with them.
Guardian Australia listened to the podcast, all 54 minutes.
In this, Newman acknowledged that he would “kick”, but said that for that’s why he was doing it, “because we talk to people who are interested”.
“I probably should stop this interview,” he said.
We will repeat the rebellious Holocaust, conspiracy theories, counter -ism and white supremacy that are gaining platforms – we were more interested in rejecting Nazi ideology to Newman.
“As long as you want,” he tells his guests on one occasion. “When you finish, I will ask you a question because I don’t want to interfere with you.” “Please keep walking,” he says to each other. “I hate to lose any of it,” he said in a debate about the construction of a white society. “
Newman said somewhat vague, “I’m not sure I agree with you, but you’ll be surprised that I agree with it.”
Responding to Newman’s attack in the context of severe criticism, Kotriel said “Newman had” largely believed that he could interview the blacklisted ‘Nazis’ with immunity. “
“You got a conflict, and you got,” It said.
Media Watch has returned for 2025, as is the media watch watchzer, which the Guardian Australia occasionally sees the watches.
Read the columnist Chris Kenny’s pieces about the start of the show with the new host Linton Basar, “The ABC’s media watch has not changed much.”
The show will be targeted by the News Corporation, Kenny expressed regret, while recognizing the news, Basar got an easy target. Kenny said all this was so “prediction”.
Paradise forbids predictions.
The sample of headlines from Kenny’s work last year is:
“Chris Kenny looked at Paul Berry near ABC Media.”
“Chris Kenny left the ABC Media Watch host.”
“Chris Kenny Media Watch host Salems.”
“Chris Kenny turned away from the ABC … and especially the media watch host Paul Berry.”
